In addition to pumping real estate valuation, it seems like moves like this are a form of cutting workers without having to do layoffs. They know a large number of workers are wont be able to readjust, and will have to quit.
In addition to pumping real estate valuation, it seems like moves like this are a form of cutting workers without having to do layoffs. They know a large number of workers are wont be able to readjust, and will have to quit.
Hey other automakers looking for an exciting new feature, you can always advertise NOT snooping as a feature and “add value” without having to do squat. Think about it, less scummy companies! (if they still exist)
How is it remotely euphamistic to say a career prosector believes in enforcing the law?
Voting for Harris is ill advised if we are concerned about fascism? Are you really saying this with Trump on the ticket?
Where are you getting this? Also NPR is center-right, they havent been on “the left” for a good while
true. This article has a responsiblly worded headline, but it only takes one outlet to get the words just wrong enough…
“he was met mainly with inaction because, he says, of fears about the amount of work involved or the cost”
No kidding, engagement drives their whole business model. And nothing engages and addicts people more than violent, hateful shit.
And its not just young men (though they are more heavily targeted) the algorithm can hijack almost any viewing pattern and steer it in a violent, xenophobic direction in a remarkably short time.
They arent going to change the algorithm unless serious action is taken by government regulation, or something (which is not a promising thought)
deleted by creator
Across the whole world, any country with democratic elections it seems
Employment is not a right? Well if we continue with a capitalist system and give most people no way to earn a living, we will need something to replace jobs for most people. We should not merely accept that it sucks and let things go to shit. We could pass laws limiting the use of AI or protecting workers, or providing basic income…
Whatever we do we had better figure it out soon, though.
But the difference I think is this isn’t just affecting a few niche industries (horses, carts and their associated care). AI is going to replace a huge, huge chunk of the workforce with no new jobs created to replace them. Even in the industrial revolution there were new jobs created - shittier jobs, but jobs. This is different.
Ok, but acting like you can’t trust any sources of info on anything is pretty destructive also. There are still some fairly reliable sources out there. Dismiss everything and you’re left with conspiracy theories.
It is stealing lots of potential work and income from professional creatives, though.
this article is depressing, damn.
Its true. I mean its possible, but with facebook involved? I feel a mistake is way more unlikely
At least thats kind of reassuring in a way, that part of it is people dont want to associate with that stuff. (Though I realize that isnt the only reason)
I know what they mean but there arent as many fence sitters in this American election anyway.
I can see this being a bigger problem in other democracies, however, where people are still swayed by facts
This is a very insightful explanation, thank you
I regularly get them from family, its annoying for this reason. But its better just use the remainders as a few bucks off a regular purchase (that id make anyway).
what! You mean he stands to profit billions after lying about his intentions?! A techbro would never!!