![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
I assumed that was their actual phone number. They received a spoofed call from themselves.
Happened to my wife once. Her own number showed up on her caller ID.
I assumed that was their actual phone number. They received a spoofed call from themselves.
Happened to my wife once. Her own number showed up on her caller ID.
They were bred as food for Aztec royalty and served like cornish game hens. Their ancestors are in their instincts telling them about us.
After we stood on the button and rolled up the window
I wish I understood this because it seems funny
Such confidence in statements that will be proven wrong in a matter of days. LOL. You’ll forget these comments by then though.
What discrepancy?
Are you implying that the presence of any homeless people in New England invalidates the idea that consistently favorable weather leads to a higher ratio of homeless people living in an area?
Probably also matters long term vs short term. When someone first becomes homeless, it usually happens where they were already living regardless of the weather. Over time, people may move to where it is more comfortable to sleep outside.
So, all cities have new homeless people plus some that just never leave. And then warm areas have new homeless people plus the long term homeless people who risked traveling to get to warmer temperatures.
There are already rules. One of the rules is that the title of the post has to match the title of the article. This post follows that rule.
What do we call the Lemmy version of a subreddit?
Wait. Was it really weed that she was vaping? I assumed it was a tobacco product.
Don’t you fucking move
Already went under, so it’s either rotting in a warehouse, being sold at clearance prices, or already in a landfill.
You’ve got the spirit though
What do you mean?
Please don’t roast me here, but why is wanting to know what someone looks like without makeup such a bad thing? I’ve never even thought about it before, so please don’t take this as advocating for it. It just doesn’t immediately occur to me what the problem would be.
I get why it’s gross to have an app to remove clothing, but makeup feels like a different category.
What about an app that changes or removes hair? Or one for sunglasses/jewelry?
Are they all gross in some way that I’m missing? Is it creepy to remove makeup from photos but not creepy to remove earrings?
Data Over Dogma*
How would we enforce the bet?
Why 20:1 and not 1:1?
Or even 1:20 if you’re so confident?
Believe in yourself. Take the 1:20 bet.
That’ll show me.