I do appreciate comments like these, which is unfortunate; I would have enjoyed replying to this with “Jark!”
Seems pretty good for 1.1 x .9, and for .9 x .8
I guess values must be pretty close
Wouldn’t a brain tumor make a cop less violent
Pumpkin pie is always made with squash. Occasionally, those squash are pumpkins
Yeah, that’s not gonna end well
I can’t imagine that 3 years of data is even remotely enough for this. I have articles of clothing that are decades old (3+ decades old), but I have never bought any piece of clothing expecting it to last that long, and the clothing that lasts isn’t always the type that I’d expect. At best, 3 years is enough for a “snapshot” of the life of most clothing, I would think.
Then again, I’ve owned the same car for the last 21 years, so maybe I am not a typical consumer.
Interesting that early canines had a very cat-like gait
After some thought, I’ve decided that we should refer to this apparent lapse by journalists as “Oceangate-gate-gate”
After decades of journalists attaching the suffix “gate” to anything even remotely scandalous, I was disappointed that I never heard anyone embrace the full stupidity of this practice by referring to this story as “Oceangate-gate”
resources
Your tax dollars at work
Were any of them any good?
deleted by creator
… something something even war criminals right twice a day
If we could just work out how to efficiently mill waste plastic into 15 μm or so sizes, we’d then be able to mix the plastics directly into our wheat flours and whey protein powders. Why try to beat plastic when we could just become plastic?
OK, but why the ship and not the booster?
I wonder if he also got the briefing on how the internet is “a series of tubes”