• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    pull a WordPress and force a TOS in the license to say you cannot be affiliated with Nintendo in any way in order to use this software.

    they want to emulate their hardware? then they can build their own emulator.

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I believe they do have their own emulator. It logically would be what powers the Nintendo arcade

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        folks thought the same for the Genesis and Atari flashbacks but some tinkering found they were using FOSS emulation. IMO FOSS projects should start charging companies that use their products dependent on scale.

        • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The thing is, we know Nintendo does have in-house developed emulators that they used for Virtual Console and then NSO and the Classic Edition.

          It’s fairly likely they didn’t take the effort to port those to PC for the museum, but still.

        • Float@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I assume most FOSS emulators have a non-commercial license, so if a company is using it to make money they are already violating the law, but who is gonna go after Nintendo for that?

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I would because it’s an open and shut case no judge would deny.

            and you would be incorrect, most GPL/fossy licensing doesn’t specifically prohibit commercial use.

          • socksy@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            17 hours ago

            If they had that, they’d no longer be FOSS and instead “source available” and half the community will raise the pitch forks. Best FOSS licence to protect against this sort of thing is AGPL because it’s toxic for corporations. But even that could be used in this case if they had the source on the same computer imo (IANAL though)

        • bitwolf@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Agreed I would totally support emus using a business software license just because of how they’re treated by business.