• DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 天前

    The video spends a lot of time on “but AVs cause accidents too”, without ever opening a single page of statistics, just some horrible articles for shock value.

    What statistics? Self driving cars are, at this point, barely even a thing - and only in very specific places. Any sort of statistics on that matter, if they exist, would be heavily skewed due to the low numbers.

    • jaschop@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 天前

      I’ll add that such statistics are very much a moving target, since AVs are still “getting better every day”. The software is (and will be) under constant development, and there will likely be tradeoffs between safety for pedestrians and convenience for passagers (e.g. how sensitive is the trigger for an emergency break?)

      Looking at it as an ongoing relationship between AV operators, regulators and people makes a lot of sense to me. I agree with the points of the video, that operators will likely push for a “just safe enough” standard and try to offload responsibilities onto bystanders.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 天前

        There’s also a common argument that the problem in AV accidents is primarily the other human drivers, which is a classic case of “if everyone just immediately changed over to doing things this way it would solve the problem!”