The logical end of the ‘Solution to bad speech is better speech’ has arrived in the age of state-sponsored social media propaganda bots versus AI-driven bots arguing back

  • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    By this definition, 9/11 proves that a jumbo jet is a WMD. I don’t know if I can call a jumbo jet a WMD.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      9/11 only had its effect because they hit the twin towers, chemical weapons can kill entire areas

      • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand the point you’re making. If airplanes hitting a building can do the same damages chemical weapons…

        Chemical weapons can kill entire areas just like planes hitting buildings. I’m a licensed pilot.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          what killed people was the damage to the buildings not the planes themselves, if the twin towers had been a chemical plant (especially one making something like phosgene, mustard gas or chlorine gas) in the middle of NY, the death toll would have made 9/11 look like a wet fart

          • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The chemical plant cannot be a WMD.

            Places cannot be WMD. This is inherent in the word weapon a weapon is not a place. The w in WMD makes it not a place

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              hey, I was arguing with the logic of planes are a WMD because 9/11, pointing out that if plans would be a WMD because the WTC towers collapsing killing a lot of people, a chemical plant would be way worse.

              but in effect a plane is not much different from the larger cruise missiles

      • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Didn’t need to kill a millions. I’m just saying that the jet hitting a building kills as many as a chemical weapon can.

        Chemical weapons not going to kill more people than 9/11.

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How the fuck are 14 155mm shells filled with mustard gas from 1980 and a few kilograms of expired growth media going to kill millions of people?