• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        I’m just happy the line on the west is so thick and dark. I’m not used to this kind of representation for the Island and I’m loving the token charity there.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Oh shit, Newfoundland left again and took NS, PEI and maybe NB with them, I didn’t even notice.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Canada is the north side of the st. Lawrence river, everything else is just that area’s backyard

  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I think that if climate change causes a lot of snow in the north to melt, it will create a lot of new arable space further north that people could potentially migrate to (even from other countries, eg climate migrants from the inhabitable equator)

    (disclaimer: never been to Canada)

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      We’ve been choked by forest fire smoke every summer for a few years now. I hear some of the boreal forest that burned down is coming back as plains. Also, interestingly, we never stopped clearing new farmland around the high 50’s of latitude.

      It’s really noticeable already as far north as I am. People will talk about how freakish the weather has been here, and then suddenly get quiet if anyone says “climate” instead of “weather” because it’s oil country and they still want to be on the denier train. Man, humanity is depressing sometimes.

      The flip side is that the traditional breadbasket areas in the center-west of this strip are basically turning into desert.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It would probably be extremely swampy for a long time. All that time it would release a tremendous amount of methane.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean, it’s already swampy. Canada has the band of current habitability shown, followed by muskeg (frozen swamp) and boreal forest for most of it’s area, followed by a strip of tundra along the coast (and continuing into all those giant uninhabited islands). Swamps are actually carbon fixers, though; it’s the process of a swamp drying out and the exposed plant matter rotting that’s the problem.

        The tundra bit has permafrost that will thaw and rot into pretty pure methane, which is bad, but that’s in line to become new boreal forest next rather than new farmland.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Could have just included the Ontario part snd Vancouver Island and it would still be true lol.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          33 minutes ago

          ? It’s just a fact. The urban agglomeration commonly known as Vancouver (any of them) is not on the large, west-coast island known as Vancouver island.

          I suspect you’re trolling.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          39 minutes ago

          Well he landed there. But he’s not there now, not for a while. Nor the town: that’s on the mainland (aka the Big Island with Moncton and New Denver on it) .

          Fun fact: there’s a Victoria Island but Victoria isn’t there either, the person nor the town.

  • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am sure some US hardliners see the map and wonder how is this country still independent.

    These positions are not defensible from military perspective.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      C’mon, it even looks like a rifle
      Who would be insane enough to invade a country, that already looks like a weapon?

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Careful how you phrase that, I heard a militia of collectors is forming to capture the biggest depiction of a gun in the world

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You want to know why Canada still exists despite having a fraction of the manpower or military of the United States?

      It’s because the United States likes Canada. We think they’re fun to have around.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        That took place entirely in the Great Lakes area. The other bit was still very, very Native.

        Also, we like to take credit for that, but that was basically the British Empire fighting for one of it’s colonies, and IIRC most of the British soldiers involved were not from here.

        No, we’re going back to the North Atlantic triangle days if the US goes funny like it appears to be going.

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Touche but US capabilities are now that of a global empire, all of Canada is within few hundred mile from US border and its core literally cuts into the US while power disparity is wider than Ukraine/Russia.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Nobody who knows much seriously thinks we’d win a conventional war. We could slap together nukes pretty quickly, but we’d probably rather just get annexed. Our defences are all diplomatic.

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump did call Trudeau governor of the great state of Canada yesterday and suggested it should become the 51st state a ~week ago

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        dude is too stupid to understand why he should not do it.

        until i hear some GOP chaney and kissegeer types, i aint worried.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, I’m not worried about imminent invasion either. A trade war will already basically cause chaos, though, and it could escalate from there. Hopefully the government is up to the task.