• jscummy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Have we really gotten to a point where chocolate milk in schools can be called ā€œabsolutely insaneā€? Chocolate milk strikes a pretty good balance between tasting good and providing nutrition, probably more than most fruit juices

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Why must it be one or the other? They should both be gone. There is no ā€œbalance.ā€ Chocolate milk and fruit juice are not healthy options, especially for children. Full stop. If it must be milk, plain 2% milk is sufficient to get the nutritional benefits.

      And we havenā€™t even considered if the milk in question has been sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup.

      • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        not healthy options, especially for children. Full stop

        I think youā€™re making this far more black and white than it needs to be. Fruit juice and sweetened milk can easily be part of a very healthy diet. Unless youā€™re a professional athlete, no one is watching their diet close enough for 8-12oz of juice to be an issue.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Weā€™re not talking about adults, though, athletic or otherwise. Weā€™re talking about children, and having a healthier diet in childhood gives better health outcomes as adults (e.g. forming good eating habits).

          Having juice or sweetened milk on a regular basis trains your body to crave it and affects your gut health negatively. Additionally, and this is anecdotal, I canā€™t imagine itā€™s helping anyoneā€™s behavior in school.

          And as far as ā€œdiet watchingā€ goes, take a look at European school lunches; generally far healthier and more well-rounded than what we find in the US, all because they give a fuck what their kids eat. Plus, I can assure you many parents are watching their kidsā€™ diets as much as they can.

          Schools shouldnā€™t be confounding the health efforts of parents. This is just shilling for the dairy industry disguised as lawmaking, plain and simple.

          • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            Seems like to make any kind of sense weā€™d have to accurately define ā€œhealthyā€. Foods are healthy or unhealthy in context for the most part.

            Is chocolate milk ā€œunhealthyā€ compared to water? Depends what youā€™re looking for, it has added sugar but also provides solid macros and decent amounts of vitamins.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              Ā·
              1 year ago

              Sure, and I agree with your premise, but at that point, why not just drink plain milk? The added sugar is superfluous on top of the lactose (plus, we havenā€™t even covered the extra processing of the chocolate or artificial flavors that are all too common in American prepackaged foods).

              But whatever the case, the politician making this ā€œstandā€ isnā€™t doing it because he wants to ensure kids get the macros they need; heā€™s in the pocket of dairy lobbyists.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      If they really want to do it right theyā€™d get rid of dairy as much as possible. Dairy is not all that great for anyone.