• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    edit: mistook you for a different poster

    No one has moved goal posts. Everyone else is saying he should be removed and I have said he should not be removed without a trial. Stop trying to misuse logical flaws as away of not addressing the actual argument.

    • theluckyone@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m sorry, I must be blind. Please point out the word “trial” in that section of the New York State Constitution.

      All I see is “… after giving to such officer a copy of the charges against him and an opportunity to be heard in his defense.”

        • theluckyone@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Be my guest. I’d like to see how many of the words in your “explanation” fail to appear in the quoted section of the NYS Constitution.

          Seems to me if the author meant a trial, they’d have used the word trial.