Anons argue in comments

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    The only important carbon part is the carbon used in transporting and growing the food in the form of fuel. We’re not releasing trapped carbon when we’re eating food as the only way we would save carbon in that situation is if we grew the food and buried it. Worrying about raw energy efficiency gets nonsensical because soon you’ll be factoring in the solar energy conversion efficiency between growing and eating plants vs growing and burying plants to turn them into oil.

    The better point is just that a bicycle is an incredibly efficient machine for moving a person in terms of energy input to work done compared to the hunks of metal cars are.

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well the meat industry is a large source of emissions isn’t it? So if our meat consumption increased due to increased caloric intake, that should have a carbon impact right?

        • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Plenty of people do everything wrong all the time. Hungry is hungry and people aren’t going to necessarily change they eating habits if they worked up an appetite biking. They may even eat poorly specifically because they feel they earned it because they exercised.