The motion against the Dutch participation in ReArm Europe was passed by a 73-71 majority of those voting, out of 150 people serving in the Tweede Kamer. While Schoof is in favor of ReArm Europe, as is coalition party VVD, coalition partners PVV, BBB and NSC voted to support the motion opposing their own Cabinet.
The coalition partners voted against a proposal of their own cabinet? What kind of clowns are in Dutch government right now? Are these Putin’s shills?
Schoof can ignore this motion, but he’d ignore the wishes of three of four coalition partners, and most notably those of the largest party in the coalition (PVV).
EDIT: To answer atro_city’s question:
NSC is a party formally founded to improve government accountability after a terrible scandal which involved the tax office using a shitty algorithm which marked innocent welfare receivers as frauds. This lead to them being treated terribly, of some the children were taken and some also took their own lives. Omtzigt, their leader, genuinely did a lot to make this issue politically important. A new party, they won an insane amount of seats during last elections, essentially meaning they were kingmakers for a new coalition. They’re pretty much just conservative, though, and they don’t really seem to know what the hell they’re doing.
BBB is a farmers’ party. They’re trying to make it so that large farming corporations can go on depositing way too much nitrogen, but this is an impossible task, so their leader, Caroline van der Plas, has shifted to simping for Israel.
The coalition partners voted against a proposal of their own cabinet? What kind of clowns are in Dutch government right now? Are these Putin’s shills?
Mostly, yes.
I wouldn’t call NSC and BBB ‘Putin’s shills’. PVV definitely; Wilders went on a nice trip to Russia after MH17.
NSC party leader Omtzigt made a declaration saying that, despite being a staunch supporter to Ukraine, ‘NSC remains fundamentally opposed to eurobonds and fundamentally opposed to the increase of budget norms.’.
Schoof can ignore this motion, but he’d ignore the wishes of three of four coalition partners, and most notably those of the largest party in the coalition (PVV).
EDIT: To answer atro_city’s question: NSC is a party formally founded to improve government accountability after a terrible scandal which involved the tax office using a shitty algorithm which marked innocent welfare receivers as frauds. This lead to them being treated terribly, of some the children were taken and some also took their own lives. Omtzigt, their leader, genuinely did a lot to make this issue politically important. A new party, they won an insane amount of seats during last elections, essentially meaning they were kingmakers for a new coalition. They’re pretty much just conservative, though, and they don’t really seem to know what the hell they’re doing.
BBB is a farmers’ party. They’re trying to make it so that large farming corporations can go on depositing way too much nitrogen, but this is an impossible task, so their leader, Caroline van der Plas, has shifted to simping for Israel.
Thank you. I don’t understand why a farmer’s union aligned with Israel would be against defence spending though. Very weird.
They’re also sort of trying to be a PVV light. It’s all very confused.