The U.S. Department of Education has announced the Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA) will resume collections of federal student loans that are in default on May 5.

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    3 months ago

    In the op-ed, McMahon says, “Why? Not because we want to be unkind to student borrowers. Borrowing money and failing to pay it back isn’t a victimless offense. Debt doesn’t go away; it gets transferred to others. If borrowers don’t pay their debts to the government, taxpayers do.”

    But when businesses need a bailout…

    Also, hilarious coming from this administration. How many bankruptcies has Trump been involved in?

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Debt is a concept not a physical thing, there isn’t anything intrinsic about it that must make it transfer to others.

      If I’m ok with forgiving $5 they my friend owes me for lunch, that doesn’t make the debt mysteriously transfer to a 3rd party.

  • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The US is THIRTY-SEVEN TRILLION DOLLARS in debt. We would have to pay off that money first before we ever get to any new debt incurred from the forgiveness of student loans.

    These people are neither honest nor credible. This is class warfare on behalf of the oligarchy to keep the lower classes subjected deep in servitude.

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t understand your statement, the student debt is already there held by the government and theoretically they plan their future revenue for the budget with payments from student loan borrowers included. So forgiving student loan debt would just be a decrease in revenue while they continue to have the same amount of debt.

      • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I don’t believe that you fail to understand how incurring more national debt being called unacceptable from the clowncult that has exploded our debt to THIRTY-SEVEN TRILLION dollars of giveaways in actual capital to the ultrawealthy ownership/rentier class is utter two-faced poor character trash. If you can’t recognize this, you’re simply a useful idiot carrying water for the rentier/ownership class in their warfare to keep the masses subservient. You suck. Do better.

        • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          But it’s not adding new debt, the federal government already holds that debt. I’m not clear if you understand that.

  • SaltSong@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yea, we know. When is the last time a Republican administration did anything to help regular people? Or anything that might be good for the economy?

    Doesn’t happen.

    • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      They are able to intercept any tax refunds and garnish your wages. Just so you’re not surprised. Once they put you in collections, it’s not really optional