return2ozma@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoRepublican says Charlie Kirk would have been Jesus' "13th disciple"www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square148linkfedilinkarrow-up1560arrow-down119cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up1541arrow-down1external-linkRepublican says Charlie Kirk would have been Jesus' "13th disciple"www.newsweek.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square148linkfedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up102·7 days agoJesus already had a 13th apostle… Dude doesn’t know about Matthias.
minus-squareThis is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days agoOr Rufus. Tap for spoiler
minus-squaredrolex@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up62·7 days agoWhile Matthias was only taking the chair left by Judas, Charlie would have really continued with the true legacy of Judas. 🙏
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·7 days agoThere’s a handful of others, but it all depends on what one considers a canonical source. Like the Dead Sea scrolls vs a King James Bible.
minus-squareDeceptichum@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·7 days agoWe all know they will only accept one bible.
minus-squarePacMan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 days agoCan’t read it , it’s not held upside down
minus-squareDae@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 days agoCorrect; early Christianity was far from monolithic, but the ultimate point is that this person very obviously doesn’t know what the fuck they’re talking about.
minus-squareBeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 days agoyeah i’m not much of a biblical scholar and that’s what i was leading with.
Jesus already had a 13th apostle… Dude doesn’t know about Matthias.
Or Rufus.
Tap for spoiler
While Matthias was only taking the chair left by Judas, Charlie would have really continued with the true legacy of Judas. 🙏
Or Paul, apparently.
There’s a handful of others, but it all depends on what one considers a canonical source. Like the Dead Sea scrolls vs a King James Bible.
We all know they will only accept one bible.
Can’t read it , it’s not held upside down
Correct; early Christianity was far from monolithic, but the ultimate point is that this person very obviously doesn’t know what the fuck they’re talking about.
yeah i’m not much of a biblical scholar and that’s what i was leading with.