Austria’s conservative Chancellor Karl Nehammer wants the right to use cash enshrined in the constitution, he told Austrian media in remarks published on Friday (4 August), an idea the far-right Freedom Party has been pushing for years.
Austria’s conservative Chancellor Karl Nehammer wants the right to use cash enshrined in the constitution, he told Austrian media in remarks published on Friday (4 August), an idea the far-right Freedom Party has been pushing for years.
If you’re unbanked, that is a you problem. Not a problem that society has to succumb to.
I want to live in a country that isn’t 50 years behind every other just because some backwards hillbilly decides that “the banks shan’t know what i spend my paycheck on”.
If you’re that concerned, stop using the Internet. Full stop.
Refugees and poor people don’t exist. I forgot. (I live near a refugee facility and bus drivers here don’t accept cash anymore, while most of the ticketing machines have been removed from the bus stops … fun. Essentially people who come here are almost forced into riding the bus without a ticket, at least a couple of times. In Germany, that is a criminal offense and can lead to extradition.)
They legitimately shouldn’t. And neither should my supermarket/drug store be able to collect all my receipts to find out whether I am sick or pregnant.
You think they can’t collate your receipts just because you pay by cash I’ve got a bridge to sell you. Facial recognition on the tills combined with time and date of till transaction and they have all they already.
The type of argument you’re making is this: “Climate change is happening anyway, let’s build more coal plants!” I don’t really agree with the type of argument in general.
Corporate surveillance that can be turned into surveillance for the state at a whim is destructive to democracy and makes society worse.
Also, facial recognition is much slower and much less precise and generates much more data/noise than just collecting info from a card. There are quite a few practical hurdles here.
Poor people? Since when can a poor person not get a bank account?
And since when can a refugee not pay by card?
Go complain to the taxman lol. no, complain to the cashier, that the cashier has to forget what you bought immediately after. Delusional.
Have you considered that some people don’t have their life all in order? May have a drug issue?
The issue is that most arrive in the EU without an EU bank account. So, yeah, the first few weeks or months, they will not have a bank account.
I get though plenty of drugs and ironicly buy them all cashless with crypto. Those people are still entitled to a basic account under a lot of countries legislation.
So, one, with most cryptocurrencies you’re not anonymous and every transaction is on a blockchain. Buying drugs with those may bite you later, depending on whether you develop any kind of ambition to be someone who’s interesting enough to investigate. Two, this comment is not about being entitled to a bank account but about having enough order in your life to handle opening/using an accoutlnt.
And what makes you think that the people youre arguing for, which are btw a tiny minority that is unmeasurable, are better with cash?
Cashless systems right now are privatized systems that are set up to be more exclusionary than cash. (I admit, there are niches where they do help inclusion, such as for blind people, but still.)
And this shows in really simple examples: I can give a child cash and tell them to get ice-cream without compromising my bank account and without the child needing to know any of my secrets or needing to have a bank account. I can give a homeless person cash without telling them my name or bank account and without them needing a bank account.
If there were a state-provided privacy-first cashless system that worked for everyone age 5+ which didn’t need to refinance itself on the back people going into personal debt, I’d be mostly for it. The only thing missing then would be the intuitive spending control you get from using physical money but maybe there’s a solution for that.
But right now, there are few giant multinationals plus local banks who make a lot of money on the current system and they will do everything to prevent this kind of idea for obvious reasons.
I am pretty sure you can find out how many people there are who are excluded by current cashless systems, if you try.
Have you considered that some people don’t have their life all in order? May have a drug issue?
Yes, i have also considered that i am vegan and stores can still sell meat. Nonissue. Or do you also argue against and ID System?
The issue is that most arrive in the EU without an EU bank account.
When i go to the US i can pay with my german mastercard in every store everywhere.
This is an issue for EU countries to get over, not me.
Cash and crypto have more bad than good sides.
So, you’re saying it’s great to be discriminated against?!
I would go about this the other way: Being vegan is a societal good (because it means you’re likelier to stay healthy; it means less resource usage; yadda). Hence, society/the state should make it as easy as possible to be vegan. A few years ago, when mainstream stores were few vegan-friendly besides produce, being a vegan was a pain though. Now, however, you have non-vegans pick up oat milk at Aldi.
Enabling people to not be criminal is a societal good as well.
No. I see legitimate reasons for a country to know its inhabitants. I do object to the fact that I need to present my ID when it’s not really necessary, like at a hotel though.
I realize you’re not a refugee.
Crypto is, by and large, bullshit. But what does it have to do with this discussion?
I can’t say much for Europe, but in America, some immigrants tend to not have IDs, birth certificates or other important documents needed to open a bank account. Other people tend to be far away from a bank, especially in poorer areas. Banks tend to serve the rich, and don’t see as much profit operating for the poor.
I’ll bet that some of the same things are true in Europe
Illegal immigrants, not all migrants. They don’t have those things because they’re in the country illegally, we can’t run society on what are by definition, criminals, can and can’t access.
So, you’d rather have anyone who’s “illegal” acquire all of life’s necessities by criminal means? That’s a good way to jack up crime stats.
I think most people would prefer them not to turn up at all and apply legally.
You missed the point. Not that I expected much after you equated arriving in the EU illegally with being a “criminal.”
I never did that, good job on your reading comprehension.
You’ve never had your identity stolen or you wouldn’t be saying that.