𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agoI'd pay good money to see this parodyi.pinimg.comimagemessage-square17linkfedilinkarrow-up1376arrow-down17
arrow-up1369arrow-down1imageI'd pay good money to see this parodyi.pinimg.com𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square17linkfedilink
minus-squaregjoel@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up40·1 month agoShould have kept a Sean bean in there unchanged.
minus-squareSomeonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoI’d much prefer to see Bean Bean instead.
minus-squarehemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 month agoThere’s no boromir in the image
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoIt’s Schrödinger’s Bean. We won’t know who is playing Boromir until we observe. This way it can be funny both ways at the same time.
Should have kept a Sean bean in there unchanged.
I’d much prefer to see Bean Bean instead.
There’s no boromir in the image
That’s the problem.
It’s Schrödinger’s Bean. We won’t know who is playing Boromir until we observe.
This way it can be funny both ways at the same time.