• turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah… That works in the context where people actually share links. Various news communities definitely fit that description, but then there are several discussion communities where links aren’t the main point. Take ask lemmy or no stupid questions for example. Oh, and then there are also picture communities like superbowl.

        Lumping all of them together with “link aggregator” platforms doesn’t fit very well. From a historical perspective that’s fine though. As far as I know, Reddit started as a link aggregator, and diversified later.

        • Die4EverA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          yea I was just joking lol, there was recently a discussion about how join-lemmy was still saying “link aggregator” and everyone thought it was a terrible description

          https://lemmy.ml/post/41719890

          • turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            But I guess that’s still technically correct, the best kind of correct. Still sounds odd, but I guess it kinda works as long as you use the term because of historical reasons.

            Regardless, now that Lemmy/Piefed has become such diverse platforms, it’s getting harder to nail it down into a single convenient term.

            I think the defining feature of these platforms is the topic focused approach. On Mastodon, you care about the people who write whatever, while on Lemmy/Piefed, you care about a topic written by whoever.