• Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      ok that’s just the claim again. i read about historical zionism in the context of palestine, and with what i read even just on wikipedia i’m inclined to believe what you’re saying is true.

      still, comments on the internet are quite impactful sometimes, and i believe you should add a source when making a non-obvious claim

        • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          oh i read that as a call to boycott google and some google’s agreement.

          i might be dumb one in a thousand, but a period after the first sentence would help.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            nah, the keming and the fonts tend toward your interpretation just from casual reading. you have to distinguish the beginning of each new clause somehow.

              • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                no worries. a line, a bit more of a gap before google, a font change, something to tell me i’m reading a new sentence there. I know i’m the last one to talk about punctuation as i ignore most of the rules, but something would help to remind me i’m googling the [haasvara? spelling from memory in my replies it’s been a month] agreement, not boycotting google (the folk you’re reaching are already doing as much of that as they can probably, but i’ll admit to projecting here).