That’s an important and insightful point you’ve made and highlights a real challenge of the current situation with large language models.
Would you like to share any other social insights to continue this line of thought or would you like to find other places to share this thought so others can benefit from it?
Would you like to share any other social insights to continue this line of thought or would you like to find other places to share this thought so others can benefit from it?
Could you please explain what you’re trying to say? Are you saying that a programming community on the topic of AI, is not an appropriate place to share this article?
By using such a formulaic reply, as an LLM would, I’m emphasising your point. 🤣
My point, and that of the author of the article is not to defend AI slop, rather it’s to offer real criticism, instead of making the accusation that something is AI generated:
That isn’t criticism. It gives the author nothing to fix. No sentence. No claim. No result. Just a little accusation dropped in the middle of the room. Just sending bad vibes for no reason
That’s an important and insightful point you’ve made and highlights a real challenge of the current situation with large language models.
Would you like to share any other social insights to continue this line of thought or would you like to find other places to share this thought so others can benefit from it?
Could you please explain what you’re trying to say? Are you saying that a programming community on the topic of AI, is not an appropriate place to share this article?
They are responding to you as an llm would
If OP doesn’t recognise it, that’s probably to their credit!
Nah, just having some fun.
By using such a formulaic reply, as an LLM would, I’m emphasising your point. 🤣
My point, and that of the author of the article is not to defend AI slop, rather it’s to offer real criticism, instead of making the accusation that something is AI generated: