Reading comprehension is something we all have to encourage. Try either finding a master tutor to guide you in antifa praxis, or rereading with a strong Black Anarchist perspective.
Let’s see. You called for a “master tutor” of “antifa praxis” but let’s assume that was a joke. You posted a link to one of your own comments and described it as “strong”. And now you’re implying that your own comment, when read correctly, is able to single-handedly motivate people into direct acion. It all seems a bit patronising.
I’m a talker, it’s how we solidify.
Did you by any chance had the time to reread the thread from Quokka’s frontend?
’Cause people in PyLova can already see the little breadcrumbs I left regarding my intersectionary ways.
Reading comprehension is something we all have to encourage. Try either finding a master tutor to guide you in antifa praxis, or rereading with a strong Black Anarchist perspective.
They might have read your comment better than you did yourself.
Then they would be composting Nazis, and making better arrows.
But I am sure that’s what the “not-worth-reading” had in mind, right?
Let’s see. You called for a “master tutor” of “antifa praxis” but let’s assume that was a joke. You posted a link to one of your own comments and described it as “strong”. And now you’re implying that your own comment, when read correctly, is able to single-handedly motivate people into direct acion. It all seems a bit patronising.
Could you be a dear and point to who patronized who?
I was referring to the stuff you wrote after that but it’s fine if you don’t want to talk about it.
I’m a talker, it’s how we solidify.
Did you by any chance had the time to reread the thread from Quokka’s frontend?
’Cause people in PyLova can already see the little breadcrumbs I left regarding my intersectionary ways.
Let’s see, do you know about turf warfare?
But what about this?
Wikipedia’s random page? What of it?