reuters.com
www.reuters.com

NATO to replace US-built AWACS with Saab GlobalEye, sources say

NATO picks Swedish jet over Boeing rival, sources say

AWACS replacement could deepen Trump-NATO tensions

  • Typotyper@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    24·
    3 days ago

    So US criticizes NATO for not buying Boeing’s E-7 AWAC surveillance jets AFTER the Pentagon decides not to buy them either.

    • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      2 days ago

      No, the free market is only good when I personally profit off of it. Competition is communism.

  • lebkuchen@feddit.orgEnglish
    6·
    2 days ago

    So we are watching NATO trying to get away from US technology and dominance to be functional when the US fails to show up in an emergency?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.caEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      NATO just wants the one without the remote kill switch in the baby hands of a belligerent narcissist.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldEnglish
    5·
    2 days ago

    I thought Saab was already decided a month ago to be the current standard for NATO?!
    AFAIK the Boeing AWAC is discontinued?

    • variaatio@nord.pubEnglish
      5·
      2 days ago

      Nope. That was rumours, rumours which was denied as having been decided by NATO. Same as this “we have sources”. Some news rooms got little over exited and reported it as hard fact already done decision, when it wasn’t. which prompted/forced NATO/national leaderships to issue denial of No such thing has been done. Though usually with ofcourse discussions of future development and improvement is always happening

      Meaning mostly likely, it is proposal under preparation. No official decision made. Something else could theoretically be chosen as alternative or fully different posture even.

      However it is atleast to me hard to see what would be the alternative. SAAB has a ready proven, already in use product. Where as others have conceptual bids. Minus ofcourse the Boeing Wedgetail, but well we know how that is going.