The context we have: âOn my flight was talking to a guy next to me & it came up that I run. He starts telling me how I need to train high mileage & pulls up an analysis heâd made of a pro runnerâs training on his phone. The pro runner was me. It was my training.â
I donât see how I havenât taken all that into account. No doubt context was left out of that post. Iâm not taking that into account because I donât know it. If I did, my opinion would probably be different.
I donât see why Iâm not allowed to think it would have been better for her to tell him.
You didnât take into account that she was there and chose how to respond. She has more context than you. But you still donât see that. I honestly donât know how else to spell it out. Youâre saying her perspective of an event that she was present for is incorrect and your perspective of an event that you werenât there for is more correct.
Youâre questioning her judgement when thereâs literally no reason to. And then youâre defending that. So why should your judgement be above questioning but not hers?
My judgement isnât above question. I donât know why you think that I think it is.
Youâre saying her perspective of an event that she was present for is incorrect and your perspective of an event that you werenât there for is more correct.
I never said that. I donât believe that.
I think that, given the context provided, he was excited about a topic he was passionate about, nothing more. If thereâs more context, I may well be wrong. But we donât have that and in the absence of more information, my opinion is my opinion.
I have offered an alternative that believe is more compelling. I might be wrong, but given the information provided, I think my reasons are good.
She had more context, and she might be right. But that hasnât been provided to us, so I canât respond to any of that.
Ugh. Dude. Are you literally programmed to ignore women as a source of information? You have more context. She implied heâd be upset if she told him that was her plan. Why do you disbelieve that? Youâre literally creating extra information that isnât there to question her narrative that sheâs given you zero reason to not believe. Why is your default to simply not believe her?
And buddy, if your judgement isnât above questioning, youâre trying really hard to argue that itâs more legitimate than hers.
Edit: so to summarize your point. Given a bunch of made up information, you disbelieve her, for no reason, other than the hypothetical you made up in your head. Got it. Totally normal way to respond to this. Not at all toxic or unhealthy in any way. Youâre totally a positive influence on society.
Ehhh, her last sentence kinda sounds like she didnât want to make him sad by telling him she already knew all of this because he was so happy about sharing.
Honestly, I like that interpretation much much more. Just makes me realize how much seeing others take it so negatively even made me see it more negatively.
Iâm starting to doubt that you have actual capacity for comprehensive reasoning. That is absolutely a direct inference of your position. Just saying âno itâs notâ doesnât just make it so. All of that is true if one holds your position.
The context we have: âOn my flight was talking to a guy next to me & it came up that I run. He starts telling me how I need to train high mileage & pulls up an analysis heâd made of a pro runnerâs training on his phone. The pro runner was me. It was my training.â
I donât see how I havenât taken all that into account. No doubt context was left out of that post. Iâm not taking that into account because I donât know it. If I did, my opinion would probably be different.
I donât see why Iâm not allowed to think it would have been better for her to tell him.
BECAUSE MEN ARE BAD OF COURSE
You didnât take into account that she was there and chose how to respond. She has more context than you. But you still donât see that. I honestly donât know how else to spell it out. Youâre saying her perspective of an event that she was present for is incorrect and your perspective of an event that you werenât there for is more correct.
Youâre questioning her judgement when thereâs literally no reason to. And then youâre defending that. So why should your judgement be above questioning but not hers?
My judgement isnât above question. I donât know why you think that I think it is.
I never said that. I donât believe that.
I think that, given the context provided, he was excited about a topic he was passionate about, nothing more. If thereâs more context, I may well be wrong. But we donât have that and in the absence of more information, my opinion is my opinion.
I have offered an alternative that believe is more compelling. I might be wrong, but given the information provided, I think my reasons are good.
She had more context, and she might be right. But that hasnât been provided to us, so I canât respond to any of that.
Ugh. Dude. Are you literally programmed to ignore women as a source of information? You have more context. She implied heâd be upset if she told him that was her plan. Why do you disbelieve that? Youâre literally creating extra information that isnât there to question her narrative that sheâs given you zero reason to not believe. Why is your default to simply not believe her?
And buddy, if your judgement isnât above questioning, youâre trying really hard to argue that itâs more legitimate than hers.
Edit: so to summarize your point. Given a bunch of made up information, you disbelieve her, for no reason, other than the hypothetical you made up in your head. Got it. Totally normal way to respond to this. Not at all toxic or unhealthy in any way. Youâre totally a positive influence on society.
Ehhh, her last sentence kinda sounds like she didnât want to make him sad by telling him she already knew all of this because he was so happy about sharing.
Honestly, I like that interpretation much much more. Just makes me realize how much seeing others take it so negatively even made me see it more negatively.
None of that accurately describes my position. Please reread my posts. I have doubts you are giving a good faith effort.
Iâm starting to doubt that you have actual capacity for comprehensive reasoning. That is absolutely a direct inference of your position. Just saying âno itâs notâ doesnât just make it so. All of that is true if one holds your position.