A lawyer for the union says the company is aligning itself with right-wing ideologues who want to destroy the regulatory state.

Trader Joeā€™s is facing a litany of union-busting charges before the National Labor Relations Board. The agencyā€™s prosecutors have accused the company of illegally retaliating against workers, firing a union supporter and spreading false information in an effort to chill an organizing campaign.

But in a hearing last Tuesday, the grocerā€™s attorney briefly summarized a sweeping defense it intends to mount against the charges: The labor board itself, which was created during the New Deal and has refereed private-sector collective bargaining for nearly 90 years, is ā€œunconstitutional.ā€

The argument would appear to fit inside a broader conservative effort to dismantle the regulatory state, which has taken aim at agencies tasked with enforcing laws to protect workers, consumers and the environment.

The exchange, a transcript of which HuffPost obtained through a public records request, came at the start of a trial to determine whether Trader Joeā€™s violated workersā€™ rights. Trader Joeā€™sā€™ attorney, Christopher Murphy of the law firm Morgan Lewis, informed the judge, Charles Muhl, that there was ā€œone final thingā€ the grocery chain wanted to add to its defense before proceedings began.

  • S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    Isnā€™t trader Joeā€™s woke? Thought they were all on board with progressivism? Not American, only vaguely aware of their reputation.

    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      Ā·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      There are no ā€œwokeā€ companies in America. Just oneā€™s who believe that messaging and coming off that way would be financially lucrative. At the end of the day, theyā€™re still companies in a capitalist country, and are just chasing the capital.

        • Machinist3359@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          Ā·
          10 months ago

          The company which used forced Uyghur labor and other sweatshops?

          IF thereā€™s any contenders for ā€œwokeā€ ā€œcompanyā€, itā€™ll be a workers coop. All other companies run on exploitation.

          • S_204@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            Ā·
            10 months ago

            Patagonia moved production out of the region after that came to light didnā€™t they? Maybe just pr, but still notable.

            What coops are producing consumer goods these days?

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        Ā·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, i mean, i dunno how this - anti-union-monsterification - happened, but they can kiss my organic vegan fair-trade ass goodbye.

        • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          10 months ago

          If you donā€™t buy it out of the hands of a farmer not working for a corporation, itā€™s gonna be a capitalist.