• self@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    it’s hard to determine exactly what the author’s talking about most of the time, but a lot of the special properties they claim for inductive Turing machines and super-recursive algorithms appear to be just ordinary von Neumann model shit? also, they seem to be rather taken with the idea that you can modify and extend a Turing machine, but that’s not magic — it’s how I was taught the theoretical foundations for a bunch of CS concepts, like nondeterministic Turing machines and their relationship to NP-complete problems

    • blakestacey@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      New top-level thread for complaining about the worst/weirdest Wikipedia article in one’s field of specialization?

      I wonder how much Rationalists have mucked up Wikipedia over the years just by being loud and persistent on topics where actual expertise would be necessary to push back.

      • self@awful.systemsM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        New top-level thread for complaining about the worst/weirdest Wikipedia article in one’s field of specialization?

        fuck yes I’m down! finally I’ve got a use for all the weird CS garbage I keep finding. do you figure this’d be better as a SneerClub or TechTakes thread?

        • blakestacey@awful.systemsM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Our house, our rules, I suppose… but maybe TechTakes is a better fit, unless the examples you have in mind seem rooted in TREACLES particularly.