• i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    since domain is centralized and subject to a state power.

    is it possible to change that or any workaround?

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      The national top-level domains are MEANT to be controlled by their relevant nation-states. They are not intended to be part of vanity URLs.

      So there’s nothing to “fix” here. This is the system working as intended, basically.

      • rdyoung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        This right here. I believe Vanuatu recalled all theirs not long ago. The average person can still register plenty of country tlds but if you do, be aware and ready for the day it gets recalled.

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Some amount of centralisation in domain management is necessary, in order to agree who owns what.

      Devolving control of TLDs to respective nations was actually a GOOD idea because it means each country can operate those TLDs in a way that fits their needs, which is already much better than all global TLDs being operated by a single organisation.

      The main mistake is that queer .af chose to register a domain controlled by a government who was very likely to have problems with what they were using it for.

      Nowadays there are a large number of ‘new’ TLDs which are not nationally controlled and may be a better choice.

      • rdyoung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Countries only control the tlds that represent them, af for Afghanistan, co.uk (obvious) .us (obvious), etc. The rest like the standard com, net, info and the others recently added like taxi, xyz, vip, etc are controlled by icann.org. Plenty of country tlds are freely available for anyone to use but buyer beware, there is precedent for a country to pull those domains back and not let others use them anymore.

      • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        another issue is migrating accounts losses post history.

        Is there really no way to keep post history with same instance new domain name?

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is the internet equivalent of choosing to open a gay bar in Kabul instead of San Francisco.

      There were plenty of safe spaces, they chose terribly.

    • rdyoung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The only ones subject to state power are the tlds that represent countries or states, counties, etc. The other tlds are controlled by another central body that isn’t connected to any country and it would take a judge ordering a seizure for a domain to be taken down.

      Basically if they had gone with any of the other shit ton of tlds that aren’t for a specific country they would still be up and running. I can’t say that I wouldn’t have grabbed that tld given the chance but knowing it was Afghanistan I wouldn’t have used that as my main domain.