Sometimes the best way to understand why something is going wrong is to look at whatā€™s going right. The asylum seekers from the border arenā€™t the only outsiders in town. Russiaā€™s 2022 invasion of Ukraine brought a separate influx of displaced people into U.S. cities that quietly assimilated most of them. ā€œWe have at least 30,000 Ukrainian refugees in the city of Chicago, and no one has even noticed,ā€ Johnson told me in a recent interview.

According to New York officials, of about 30,000 Ukrainians who resettled there, very few ended up in shelters. By contrast, the city has scrambled to open nearly 200 emergency shelters to house asylees from the southwest border.

What ensured the quiet assimilation of displaced Ukrainians? Why has the arrival of asylum seekers from Latin America been so different? And why have some cities managed to weather the so-called crisis without any outcry or political backlash? In interviews with mayors, other municipal officials, nonprofit leaders, and immigration lawyers in several states, I pieced together an answer stemming from two major differences in federal policy. First, the Biden administration admitted the Ukrainians under terms that allowed them to work right away. Second, the feds had a plan for where to place these newcomers. It included coordination with local governments, individual sponsors, and civil-society groups. The Biden administration did not leave Ukrainian newcomers vulnerable to the whims of Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who since April 2022 has transported 37,800 migrants to New York City, 31,400 to Chicago, and thousands more to other blue citiesā€”in a successful bid to push the immigration debate rightward and advance the idea that immigrants are a burden on native-born people.

To call this moment a ā€œmigrant crisisā€ is to let elected federal officials off the hook. But a ā€œcrisis of politicians kicking the problem down the road until opportunists set it on fireā€ is hard to fit into a tweet, so weā€™ll have to make do.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240222123138/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/02/asylum-seekers-migrant-crisis/677464/

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    9 months ago

    Bidenā€™s excuse is the same institutional racism that is the Republicansā€™ excuse. I mean itā€™s no secret that Biden has race issues too. The problem is that Trump is far worse. So you either hold your nose and vote for Biden, you vote for someone who has no realistic likelihood of winning, or donā€™t vote. I would suggest that only the first of these will stop that treasonous rapist wannabe-dictator from regaining power.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      9 months ago

      I mean itā€™s no secret that Biden has race issues too

      You have no idea how refreshing it is to not be gaslit about this for once. Honestly, hearing people acknowledge his flaws makes me a lot more ok with voting for him, because I can hold on to the belief that maybe there will be enough political pressure on the party that these mistakes wonā€™t get repeated by the next Democratic president.

      The problem is that Trump is far worse.

      Tell me about it