• Nacktmull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why wouldn’t they? It’s just text. It’s not the original Quran. It’s not that big of a deal, but making it a big deal is a violation of the principle of free speech.

      It´s is definitely not. Burning something and saying something are two particularly different things

      I’d argue Muslims that immigrated from the middle east and having anti-gay parades with other hateful domestic morons is far worse than that.

      But why??? I thought you love your holy dogma of free speech so much?

      • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But why??? I thought you love your holy dogma of free speech so much?

        They have completely different messages.

        Anti gay parade: Gay people shouldn’t be allowed. We tell you how you should behave.

        Book burning: Book burnings must be allowed. Don’t tell us what not to do.

        If anti gay parades were without consequence for gay people, or if book burnings would result in harm to muslims, you’d have a point. But only one group out of the two has demands for another, and it’s not the bunch with the lighters.

        • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Book burners: Muslim people protesting desecration of their most holy signals should not be allowed. We tell you how you should behave.

          I will not answer the homophobic parade example though because that is just a feeble derailing attempt …