Michael Macartney, 50, confessed to the BBC his role in an extreme monkey torture network.

A ringleader in a global monkey torture network exposed by the BBC has been charged by US federal prosecutors.

Michael Macartney, 50, who went by the alias “Torture King”, was charged in Virginia with conspiracy to create and distribute animal-crushing videos.

Mr Macartney was one of three key distributors identified by the BBC Eye team during a year-long investigation into sadistic monkey torture groups.

Two women have also been charged in the UK following the investigation.

Warning: This article contains disturbing content

Mr Macartney, a former motorcycle gang member who previously spent time in prison, ran several chat groups for monkey torture enthusiasts from around the world on the encrypted messaging app Telegram.

  • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
    2·
    7 months ago

    No one is saying that’s not true. You are not making a point there. Connecting the people willing to do it to the people willing to view it increases demand and increases the occurrence.

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      14·
      7 months ago

      You don’t seem to be making a very different point here. Yes, it increases demand, but, as I said, those committing the violence are the ones who should be held more to account in my opinion, which is what start this conversation chain.

      • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
        2·
        7 months ago

        The start of the conversation seems to be someone saying that what he did was fucked up and he deserves more than 5 years for it. Then you wanted to make a distinction about his role in the torture for entertainment industry. If your point was that the people committing the torture directly should receive longer sentences than him then you did just about the worst job possible to convey that.

        • ABCDE@lemmy.world
          14·
          7 months ago

          Yes, running chat groups is not as bad as actually torturing and killing monkeys.

          I made it pretty clear yesterday.

          • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
            2·
            7 months ago

            No you didn’t. That doesn’t make your supposed point that the people that did the torture directly deserve more time in jail than him. You took a weird stand at a weird time and communicated it very poorly the whole way through.

            • ABCDE@lemmy.world
              14·
              7 months ago

              Yes it does. “A weird time”? I don’t choose to post at specific times of the day. Never mind then.

              • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
                2·
                7 months ago

                No it doesn’t. It says nothing about relative jail time. The weird time is the point of the conversation you joined in at.

                • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                  13·
                  7 months ago

                  Of course it doesn’t, I wasn’t addressing that specifically, but you can understand that is part and parcel of what a ‘worse’ crime should get.

                  What is weird about joining a conversation at the start?

                  • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
                    1·
                    7 months ago

                    Then what exactly were you addressing? You haven’t made the intent of your initial comment clear at all. SeaJ said that what the guy did was fucked up and deserves more jail time. What does that have to do with your comment? He didn’t say anything about the sentencing for the others.