Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post, thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    SCP-8008: TIME PERVERT

    https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-8008

    This SCP Wiki entry riffs on our favorite fan fiction extruder cum doomsayer. It is the deepest, weirdest cut, it relies on having some familiarity with SCP Wiki lore, and it is also very NSFW.

    Iā€™m sorry.

    • Mii@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      Okay, that was actually funny, even though I understood zero of the in-world references. Is the whole SCP project like that or is this one an outlier?

      I was of the impression that itā€™s just X-files meets bad creepypasta (I remember the one from years back where some paper-mĆ¢chĆ© statue chased you around when you werenā€™t looking at it) and never paid much attention to it.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This seems a bit typical for an scp apart from the length (which does work as a meta criticism on Rationalist writing), the focus on a real life irrelevant person, and the weird strawmanning of that person. (Not a big fan of making Yudkowsky into an allpowerful god who acts like a 20-40 year old far right hentai addicted incel (Otoh, if you used the real Yudkowsky as a model this would get mean and distasteful (from the writers side I mean) really fast, so that is a good choice) who is then re-purposed by the foundation into living a fulfilling life in consensus reality (aka, the implication is that in the real world their trick worked, and he is now using his godlike powers to fight the acausalrobotgod, critihype). The idea that to stop him we also created the patriarchy and misogyny also missed the mark a little bit imho, but they saw a previous SCP and used it so it does fit). Seeing flawed Rationalist rationalizations of their dubious actions made this explicit was amusing however.

        Iā€™m sure Yudkowsky was just as amused as we were when reading this, and considering a picture of his was used, and how the SCP files think about consent like things, I assume he was at least asked for permission.

        Edit, anyway if you want to know more about the SCP files, or want to read some of their best more accessible writings (imho, and take into account this is the ā€˜more accessible SCP filesā€™ writings not a general accessible writings remark), I talked about the There Is No Antimemetics Division storyline in a previous comment.

        edit2: Hahah, lol, I partially agree (on why the thing is bad, not their opinions about r/sc) with this sneerclub hater. congrats on failing the intellectual turing test palindromordnilap, im almost tempted to make an account just to post in agreement with them.

          • Billy Smith@social.coop
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            Ā·
            8 months ago

            @Dtl @dgerard @mii

            The world-building in that narrative thread is extremely chewy. :D

            Because of the silo-ed nature of the OCP bureaucracy, no-one really knows how many times that the world has been destroyed and re-built. :D

              • Billy Smith@social.coop
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                Ā·
                8 months ago

                @Dtl @dgerard @mii @cstross

                The game mechanics are similar to most tactical MMORPGā€™s, but itā€™s the quality of the storytelling that stands out. :D

                In the first section that you are sent to explore, the player is acting as an investigator/cleaner in an HP Lovecraft story. :D

                What is also interesting from the pov of gameplay, is that you can only make some of the choices once in the main story arc. :D

                Want to make different choices, you have to start again with a new character. :D

      • o7___o7@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        8 months ago

        By the way, there are several folks in the wikidot comments who are also Neoreaction: A Basilisk enjoyers!

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        8 months ago

        so now being possessed by the spirit of yud is another thing we need to worry about?

        life used to be so simple! RETVRN@