• Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m seeing a lot of these memes lately… is this a particular type of landlord or all landlords? Just want to make sure as reasonable people that we should at least do our part to logically assume that some money is required to the maintenance of upholding the structure you’re renting. I’m sure we can agree that there is labour on working on maintenance and those workers also deserve a living wage.

    • Shampiss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I guess this is targeting landlords that just live off the rent income and/or own multiple houses

      You could argue that Landlords who only live off rent money are contributing nothing to society while still having a considerable income.

      In Amsterdam for example, if you have 1 property in the state you’re allowed to rent normally, but from the 2nd property on you can only make your house available for affordable rent programs (for refugees, low income families etc)

      Which is cool cause it discourages people to buy multiple houses and live off rent

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They are hiring the people who do maintenance. So them asking you for money to pay for it isn’t parasitic. It’s most definitely justified. You’re living in a unit, you’re banging it up, so someone has to put on the adult pants and keep the roof over your head standing.

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yet somehow your complaining rent exists. Then just buy your property and pay for your own maintenance. But sounds like you just want to argue in bad faith even though it’s clear that some money is used for reasonable things in a rental agreement.

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m saying landlords aren’t necessary, especially if all you’re arguing they’re needed for is paying for ‘maintenance’.

              Your “just buy the property” quip is basically just ‘cry harder, plebe’. If anyone is ‘arguing’ in bad faith, it’s you.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They would need money to put to hiring contractors for a house you’re living in to maintain it. These people also should be paid for their time and should be permitted a living wage.

        Anything less is being the very evil you hate.