China has taken big stakes in mines across the world extracting minerals vital to the green economy.

…

As Chinese companies have increased their overseas mining operations, allegations of problems caused by these projects have steadily risen.

The Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, an NGO, says such troubles are “not unique to Chinese mining” but last year it published a report listing 102 allegations made against Chinese companies involved in extracting critical minerals, ranging from violations of the rights of local communities to damage to ecosystems and unsafe working conditions.

These allegations dated from 2021 and 2022. The BBC has counted more than 40 further allegations that were made in 2023, and reported by NGOs or in the media.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
    103·
    2 months ago

    First of all, electric trains require batteries, which require these minerals. Secondly, so does every electronic device in your house for other reasons.

    So I have no idea why you think electric trains will do anything about mining conflict minerals.

    • ExhaleSmile@lemmy.worldEnglish
      71·
      2 months ago

      Not trying to nitpick your general point, but electric trains can get power from an electrified third rail or overhead lines.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          English
          2·
          2 months ago

          You have no idea what you are talking about… Electric trains predate the combustion engine and were used to transport trains all over the world. You are pretending as if it’s difficult to hang a wire over train tracks, or electrify a track.

          Battery powered trains are largely a failure, as you are using most of the output of the battery to move the battery. They typically only have about a 100k range and are only employed in cities as local transit.

          Every high-speed train on the planet is run on electrified rail, a third of all railways are electrified, this including the entirety of the trans Siberian railway.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              English
              4·
              2 months ago

              https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/first-battery-powered-trains-europe-180982468/

              “The trains have the ability to switch between battery power, electricity and diesel. They can travel roughly ten miles relying only on batteries”

              Maybe read the article you posted as evidence? It’s not a battery powered train, it’s just an electric train that has a small battery to reap back a little energy conservation from braking. The battery is largely just a marketing tool used to sell it to politicians.

              https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/first-of-many-battery-trains-enter-service-in-germany/

              “They are designed to replace diesel multiple units and operate as regular electric trains when running on electrified lines”

              The same train system.

              Also, stringing cables across vast distances where there are no cables is not some sort of simple task like you make it out to be.

              Harder than laying rail lines across the same vast distances…? Or harder than replacing every engine with a battery power, and maintaining those complicated engines and replacing those consumable batteries?

              Again, you obviously have no knowledge about trains. Why are you so set on spreading misinformation about them?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
                23·
                2 months ago

                Harder than laying rail lines that already exist? Yes. Why wouldn’t it be? Or do all new tracks also need to be built?

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                  English
                  3·
                  2 months ago

                  Harder than laying rail lines that already exist? Yes. Why wouldn’t it be?

                  What do you think is harder, leveling, elevating, compacting, laying down ties, and then laying and welding kilometers of the rail…or you just digging a hole every 200 yards and hanging wire?

                  We are already doing things a lot more difficult by simply laying down track, electrifying it isn’t going to be a problem. If the Russians could electrify rail all the way to the Pacific +50 years ago, I think we can manage.

                  do all new tracks also need to be built?

                  No, you could hang wire relatively easily and cheaply. But electrifying the rail would be the best solution. Something you could easily do while doing track maintenance over time.

                  The rails we utilize have to be regularly replaced anyways, we aren’t running on the same track we laid down a hundred years ago.

                  This is not a difficult material problem, this is how the majority of large nations handle mass transportation. America is just more concerned with protecting their car and airplane industry than they care about logistics or about solving climate change.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
                    23·
                    2 months ago

                    The tracks could have been laid down 100 years ago and just replaced on an as-needed basis. Why you think that rapidly laying wires all over the place in order to stave off climate change is some simple task that people just need to make an effort at I don’t know.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      English
      4·
      2 months ago

      First of all, electric trains require batteries, which require these minerals. Secondly, so does every electronic device in your house for other reasons.

      Electric trains don’t run on batteries… It’s through an electrified rail, or overhead wiring. Do you think they had batteries in the 1800s that were energy dense enough to push a cast iron train?