• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re not, your playing this little game because you know you can’t defend your position.

        • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          What game? I’m trying to game a serious discussion and help you make am ironclad argument so I can respond to it appropriately.

          Response to your comment below because your inability to understand the basics of debating combined with your need to constantly belittle anyone with a different opinion seems to have caused us to hit the thread limit:

          Hahaha for a guy who likes to take digs on the reading comprehension of others yours isn’t any better.

          You’ve got maybe half of it, that I’m asking for A because B but I’ve already explained why B is B. If you can’t understand than I guess you’re the one who’s gotta go back to 5th grade.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’ll distill your circular logic. Hopefully it’s simple enough for you to grasp.

            You have to provide A (good white supremists) because of B (comparison between white supremists violence and Muslim violence is invalid) but I won’t provide evidence of B until you provide A.

            This is the game your playing because you don’t have evidence of B.