dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 months agoRulelemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1222arrow-down10
arrow-up1222arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.sdf.orgdadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 months agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up23·6 months agoI know this isn’t true because we’re not called the United States of Funk
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·6 months agoIt is actually true, just the portrait they’ve chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn’t really look like him.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-26 months ago“Highly stylized” as in “an entirely different person”
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·6 months agoWell not entirely different. They’re both named George.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoTrue. Someone needs to make a venn diagram
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 months agoThey also both had sons named George.
I know this isn’t true because we’re not called the United States of Funk
It is actually true, just the portrait they’ve chosen for the article is highly stylized and didn’t really look like him.
“Highly stylized” as in “an entirely different person”
Well not entirely different. They’re both named George.
True. Someone needs to make a venn diagram
They also both had sons named George.