• katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    people please actually read the article not the headline; this is literally about accessibility improvements for blind and visually impaired people for generating alt text inside of documents and pdfs.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s one of the things, but it’s also adding a dedicated sidebar for AI. That’s the sort of thing that should just be an extension, there’s absolutely no reason at all why that needs to be something built into the browser.

      Developers should be providing alt text themselves, but in cases where they aren’t having a local image recognition model running to provide a description isn’t terrible as long as it’s either 100% local or completely opt-in.

      The dedicated sidebar on the other hand feels very much like a cheap attempt to cash in on the AI fad.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the sort of thing that should just be an extension

        It most likely is on the technical level, just shipped by default and integrated into standard settings instead of the add-on ones. And it’s going to be opt-in, so you won’t have to go into about:config to disable it. Speaking of: You’re looking for extensions.pocket.enabled, it should be false. And before you say “muh diskspace” it’s probably like 5k of js and css or such.

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      access their preferred AI service from the Firefox sidebar to summarize information, simplify language, or test their knowledge, all without leaving their current web page.

      Our initial offering will include ChatGPT, Google Gemini, HuggingChat, and Le Chat Mistral

    • proti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      yeah but AI bad no matter if it would be actually useful for once

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Now we just need accessibility tools for the cognitively impaired that can’t seem to read the damn article.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Many of the people complaining about a feature they would just disable and never use are also the same kinds of people who would complain about basic accessibility features and call them “unnecessary bloat”.

        • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Blind people shouldn’t need to give up their privacy to Microsoft and Google to have a web page read to them.

          • essteeyou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Let me just quote the top of this thread.

            people please actually read the article not the headline; this is literally about accessibility improvements for blind and visually impaired people for generating alt text inside of documents and pdfs.

            It doesn’t just read the page to them, which is a solved problem, it generates descriptions when they’re missing, making the web more accessible.