Mwalimu@baraza.africa to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoGlobal IT outage shows dangers of cashless society, campaigners saywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square198fedilinkarrow-up1558arrow-down136cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1522arrow-down1external-linkGlobal IT outage shows dangers of cashless society, campaigners saywww.theguardian.comMwalimu@baraza.africa to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square198fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoBecause the equipment used to record sales uses electricity. Do you really think the 12yo cashier is going to get out a pad and pen and rithmatic your purchase?
minus-squareEnkrod@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months ago12yo? What’re your child labor laws? Arithmetic? We’re talking simple addition here. I manned a cash register before, it’s doable even without the computer. Just takes a wee bit longer.
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoHave you been to a shop in the last 20 years? I’m genuinely curious how you envisage that everyone could pay cash during a power outage. Items don’t have price stickers. Cashiers couldn’t reliable total up more than a few items. Customers couldn’t be given itemised receipts. In an end-of-days style apocalypse, sure trade would carry on, but the existence of “cash” wouldn’t be relevant. As I started off by saying, this is such a lame reason to argue for the existence of cash.
Because the equipment used to record sales uses electricity.
Do you really think the 12yo cashier is going to get out a pad and pen and rithmatic your purchase?
12yo? What’re your child labor laws? Arithmetic? We’re talking simple addition here. I manned a cash register before, it’s doable even without the computer. Just takes a wee bit longer.
Have you been to a shop in the last 20 years?
I’m genuinely curious how you envisage that everyone could pay cash during a power outage.
Items don’t have price stickers. Cashiers couldn’t reliable total up more than a few items. Customers couldn’t be given itemised receipts.
In an end-of-days style apocalypse, sure trade would carry on, but the existence of “cash” wouldn’t be relevant.
As I started off by saying, this is such a lame reason to argue for the existence of cash.