White is not the only high-level cyclist to die in Colorado in recent years. In 2020, Clif Pro Team racer Ben Sonntag was killed by a driver while on a training ride outside Durango. That driver was sentenced to serve jail time in late 2021. In 2021, U.S. masters champion Gwen Inglis was killed by a driver outside Lakewood, Colorado.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, very safe when drivers are not speeding, not dangerously passing, and paying attention.

    Key word is WHEN. Often times they aren’t. That’s like saying things are safe until they aren’t. Accidents happen because people do dumb things. You seem to have a lot of trouble accepting this, which is the source of your issue. The general public has already proven, and continues to prove how unsafe and how irresponsible they are, especially in cars. Your inability to accept this is hilarious.

    In other words, when drivers are driving like they are expected to, there’s no conflict.

    Except that isn’t always the case. You have to consider the times when they aren’t driving like you expect. Again, you can’t decipher between expectations and reality. You’re basing the safety of cycling on expectations, not reality.

    What’s so hard to understand?

    You tell me. You’re the one struggling with this concept, not me. I’ve already acknowledged how unsafe vehicles are, how unsafe people are. You keep arguing with me telling me how unsafe cars are, how unsafe drivers are, yet you can’t piece together the fact that cycling around cars is therefore unsafe.

    It’s just logic dude. Cars = unsafe, therefore cycling near cars is unsafe. No amount of manipulating of statistics is going to change this.

    Then, you keep arguing with me talking about how cyclists have no alternative. Well, I don’t really care to be honest. That isn’t my problem to figure out. Just because you feel like you have no alternative, isn’t a very good reason to keep risking you life just so you can joy ride around town for funzies. With that said, if you continue to do so, no one is really going to care. If you get hit by a car that is ultimately your problem, and the person that hit you, not mine.

    Go ride around your bike all you want. Just accept the fact that it’s dangerous to do so around moving cars, and that you’re taking a risk that you could otherwise avoid by simply NOT cycling around cars. If you can’t figure out where to go where there aren’t cars then that’s a YOU problem. The risk profile doesn’t change just because you don’t feel like accepting it. There are plenty of alternatives you’re just too stubborn and entitled to consider them. Just don’t be surprised when you get hit by a car.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Key word is WHEN. Often times they aren’t. That’s like saying things are safe until they aren’t. Accidents happen because people do dumb things. You seem to have a lot of trouble accepting this

      Now we’re getting somewhere! Up until this point, you’ve assigned those “dumb things” to the people not driving cars. But they aren’t “accidents” when a driver is speeding, making dangerous passes, or not paying attention. That’s negligence causing bodily harm and/or homicide. Real crimes with real consequences.

      Getting hit by a motorist doing dumb things isn’t a crime, it’s a result of a crime. That person is the victim.

      You haven’t acknowledged this. You’ve only assigned blame to the victim.

      You have to consider the times when they aren’t driving like you expect. Again, you can’t decipher between expectations and reality. You’re basing the safety of cycling on expectations, not reality.

      We expect planes to not fall out of the sky, yet nobody blames someone for getting hit by a falling plane.

      Cycling is safer than driving. This is reality. The times when it is not safe (but still SAFER than driving) it’s very often because of people in cars. That’s a fact. You can choose to use a more dangerous form of transportation, like a car, but don’t act like cycling is the more dangerous of the two options.

      Go ride around your bike all you want. Just accept the fact that it’s dangerous to do so around moving cars, and that you’re taking a risk that you could otherwise avoid by simply NOT cycling around cars.

      Seriously, as I’ve already illustrated quite a few times already, it’s not about “cycling around cars”, but simply being around cars that puts EVERYONE at risk. Standing, walking, watching TV in your home, getting a hair cut, waiting for a bus… every action near cars has the potential to be dangerous because of the cars, not the action!

      Your solution punishes victims, rather than address the cause.

      This thread had run its course. Good luck with everything.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only point you’ve made through all of your rambling is that you lack the ability to assess risk. Comparing airplanes falling out of the sky to getting hit by a car while on a road just shows your lack of ability.

        There is definitely one thing you’re right about, which is that continuing this conversation is a complete waste of time. You’ll forever be the person who is too blind to see what is in front of them.

        Your solution punishes victims, rather than address the cause.

        No, my solution avoids getting hit by cars. You’re just too blind to see it.

        it’s not about “cycling around cars”, but simply being around cars that puts EVERYONE at risk.

        So then use better judgement and stop doing things near cars. Cycling would be an obvious one. Building sand castles next to a road is also a bad idea. You’re the type that would build sand castles next to roads.