

Well, how else are they supposed to “defend themselves”? /s
Well, how else are they supposed to “defend themselves”? /s
I think if you need to physically touch someone in order to even know if they’re wearing a bra…then it doesn’t matter.
This is just what’s called the “common core method”. It’s now the preferred method of teaching math in many Western countries.
Makes sense. The public no longer blindly supports this kind of shit like they used to…so authoritarian tactics are now required to keep getting away with doing it.
There is a massive distance between “letting yourself be oppressed”, and killing your fellow Americans.
If you’re advocating for civil war, then you’ve already abandoned those rights you claim to be protecting. Yours. Theirs. None of that will matter when war breaks out. Just death and atrocities on both sides.
Ummm, ok. That’s just this post. Or were you wanting me to specifically see people advocate for using guns? Is that the plan? Just shoot them all?
Because that would be the “mass murder” I mentioned above.
Removed by mod
And the Great Dumbing Down continues.
I’m confused. Does she want him to stop with his plans to expand extraction and exports?
You’re right. That is just a thought experiment.
You don’t need rifles if you have the numbers.
Do you?
Because the Trump administration is stacked with incompetent morons that could barely organize a parade, let alone a mass-deportation project.
Aaahh, yes. Yet another call for civil war, mass murder and violence. Good times.
“Mayoral candidate kidnapped by group of armed, masked individuals claiming to be immigration agents.”
FTFY.
They can try all they want. If it violates the Charter, it will never get past the debate stage before getting scrapped. There’s no point in passing legislation that will just get thrown out the first time it goes to court.
You don’t have to worry. There are already legal advocacy groups preparing to challenge it. It will never make it to a vote.
“If being held in contempt is what it costs to defend the rule of law and stand firmly behind President Trump’s agenda on illegal immigration, so be it,”
Lol! Wut? How can you “defend the rule of law” by defiying a court order? That’s the literal definition of “defying the law”.