I told them their “MEN DON’T POST HERE” posts on the frontpage are hostile, which is the reaction they got from a half dozen folks who were talking about the subject. I talked about my experience as a gay man, wanting more community here on Lemmy, but that I wouldn’t start communities or threads saying “NO STRAIGHT PEOPLE POST HERE” to do it. And I pointed out their community has decided there are only two ways to deal with it.

I get that I broke their rule, and I can be banned there for that - but they didn’t ban me for being a man, they banned me for hurting their feelings.

And now I can’t use LGBTQ and Trans communities as a result. OK, fuck turtlesareneat, he shouldn’t be allowed in queer communities cause he hurt a mod’s feelings.

deleted by creator

Removed by mod

The hypothetical way to do it is severely penalize companies within California that pay federal tax. Make it so financially burdonsome they have to relocate or stop paying federal tax of their own accord. This is just what’s been suggested before when this has come up.

Removed by mod

No they’re talking the wealth of the 1%, which is not the infrastructure of the US.

I pretend (in a non-grotesque sort of way) that the other person is “dead” to me and that I could “summon” them with a “seance” (text) but it’d be terribly unnatural and there’d be an awful price to pay.

Basically if I make my breakup Practical Magic, it helps somehow heh

They got the headline they wanted.

They did in this case, too.

Trump still playing the media like a fiddle.

Just a reminder, you can get your and your loved ones’ immunity to various things tested and boosted now while there’s still time. I found out I am no longer immune to measles at 42 and am getting boostered as there’s a kid in my life.

Yep food pantries will repackage food but rarely process or cook it because that’s a whole different animal.

But, many food pantries I’ve worked with had ways to offload large amounts of things creatively, it’s how I got the best pear gelato I’ve ever had in my life.

A woman having a child is the biggest reduction. Make of that what you will. I sure hope the placenta, and not the baby, is getting the remainder. But I am guessing both.

When do we get to the part where a bunch of UNIX logs get projected, backward, on someone’s face

I’m gonna put two jars down, one that says DO and one that says DON’T, y’all can vote with dollar bills

Part of conservatism is the idea that “the more complex a solution is, the wronger it is.”

Another part is “We should be able to control women’s use of their hoo-hoos for pleasure by restricting them to being baby chambers.”

Here we have a venn diagram where the circles are the same.

Correct. I have had this problem again and again - I like top energy but I want to, you know, top them.

First one, we were sexually incompatible (both tops) which only got worse over time. We opened the relationship which doomed it.

Second one, in progress: we’re both addicts, I got sober, he’s still struggling, but I think he won’t get clean until I am actually good and gone. Enablement is sometimes not something you can avoid doing once the systems are built… resentments the same.

Heyyy

They will just disable the mute buttons. It happens around here all the time, marking them accelerates it.

I now avoid any gas station with immutable ads. But if I am in a pinch. The longest sharpest key on your key ring can slide right in and puncture the speaker, thus solving the issue more permanently.

Nationalization is the opposite of privatization, it’s how the US’s bureaucratic state was really built, we should absolutely do this and right now is the time

No there were crosswalks, but the kids decided to “jaywalk” or cross outside a crossing, hence the reason the driver’s not being charged. Drivers should be aware yes but it’s not expected that children will dart out onto the road, frogger-style trying to cross outside crosswalks, much the reason I am afraid of my dumb dog doing it.