In light of the recent election, itā€™s clear that the Democratic Party needs a significant leftward shift to better address the needs and concerns of the American people. The partyā€™s centrist approach is increasingly out of touch, limiting its ability to appeal to a broader base and especially to young voters, who are looking for bold and transformative policies. The fact that young men became a substantial part of the conservative voting bloc should be a wake-up callā€”itā€™s essential that the Democratic Party broadens its appeal by offering real solutions that resonate with this demographic.

Furthermore, one major missed opportunity was the decision to forgo primaries, which could have brought new energy and ideas to the ticket. Joe Bidenā€™s choice to run for a second term, despite earlier implications of a one-term presidency, may have ultimately contributed to the loss by undermining trust in his promises. Had the party explored alternative candidates in a primary process, the outcome could have been vastly different. It is now imperative for the Working Families Party and the Progressive Caucus to push for a stronger, unapologetically progressive agenda within the Democratic Party. The time for centrist compromises has passed, as evidenced by setbacks dating back to Hillary Clintonā€™s 2016 loss, the persistently low approval ratings for Biden since 2022, and Kamala Harrisā€™s recent campaign, which left many progressives feeling alienated. To regain momentum and genuinely connect with the electorate, a clear departure from moderate politics is essential.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Is climate change legislation progressive?

      Is student debt relief progressive?

      Is UBI progressive?

      Biden enacted versions of all of those, and was more pro-union and pro-LGBTQ than Clinton or Obama or Carter.

      But youā€™ve kind of proven my point. Progressives wonā€™t vote for someone who enacts some progressive policies, even if itā€™s more than any other recent president. Progressives demand someone who gives them everything they want.

      For years, all Democrats heard from progressives was ā€œNot enough debt reliefā€ or ā€œYou call that UBI?ā€ And of course, ā€œHe still hasnā€™t earned my voteā€. On top of that, progressives get very jealous when Democrats also try to please centrists. As though Democrats have to pass a purity test rather than try to maximize their votes.

      I do not expect the next Democratic candidate to even bother with student debt relief. I think the lesson that Democrats will learn is that it is almost impossible to ā€œearn the voteā€ of progressives. They will always give up on you.

      Compare the success of progressives to, say, NRA supporters. Have you ever heard an NRA supporter say, ā€œThe GOP still hasnā€™t earned my voteā€?

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Is UBI progressive?

        Inform me on Bidenā€™s support of UBI that you are referencingā€¦

        I do not expect the next Democratic candidate to even bother with student debt relief. I think the lesson that Democrats will learn is that it is almost impossible to ā€œearn the voteā€ of progressives.

        Honest question: Do you expect the next Democratic candidate to win?

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Bidenā€™s support of UBI

          Bidenā€™s Stimulus Plan Contains an Experiment in Universal Basic Income

          Do you expect the next Democratic candidate to win?

          I donā€™t know. It depends on whether Trump screws the pooch for most Americans. I definitely think he will, so I think Democrats have a decent chance to win.

          But I think there is a more important question for progressives. Itā€™s easy to criticize and browbeat Democrats, but that doesnā€™t help pass progressive policy. It actually makes Democrats turn away from progressives and look for easier-to-please voters. And maybe they lose once more, but again: how does that help progressives?

          I think progressives could take some hints from their opponents on the right. Anti-abortionists and gun nuts are fanatically loyal to the GOP. There is no question whether they will vote GOP in 2028 or 2032 or 2036.

          And they are very patient. Anti-abortionists set Dobbs into motion thirty years ago! They donā€™t care that Trump used to be pro-choice and didnā€™t really want condemn abortion this year and has probably paid for an abortion or three. Over time, the GOP has rewarded them more than any other interest group.

          In the end, parties reward loyalty. Not threats to stay home on election day.

          • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            Ā·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            The one-time $1400 payments following covid and a child tax credit is UBI? Oh, so youā€™re just being disingenuousā€¦

            I think what you need to realize is that the Democrats genuinely need progressive votes in order to win, period. You do not have the numbers, otherwise. The progressives do not need Democrats in order to continue losing, they already are losing either way in a first-past-the-post voting system. That is just reality. You can forsake them and instead try to embrace ā€œcentristsā€, but youā€™ll just lose, like 2016 and 2024.

            are fanatically loyal to the GOP. There is no question whether they will vote GOP in 2028 or 2032 or 2036.

            Youā€™re also describing the ā€œcentristsā€ that Democrats waste their time courtingā€¦

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              Ā·
              7 days ago

              ā€œYou call that UBI?ā€

              Just as I predicted!

              Democrats genuinely need progressive votes in order to win

              The point is that they do not need a progressive candidate to win. Bill Clinton and Obama werenā€™t progressive, after all.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  Ā·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  It wasnā€™t a losing strategy in the past.

                  The key for Democrats is to realize that ā€œprogressivismā€ is impossibly broad. So there is no way to deliver on that promise.

                  However, a candidate who does not identify as ā€œprogressiveā€ can still deliver specific promises to progressives. Say, a carbon tax and a trans rights law. And thatā€™s it.

                  For a progressives who care about climate and/or trans rights, that might be enough to vote for the Democrat. Sure, they arenā€™t promising UBI or student debt relief or housing or a minimum wage hike. Maybe the other things in their platform are aimed at Latinos and liberals.

                  But if you actually care about trans rights, why not vote for the Democrat who will deliver that instead of the Republican who offers nothing or the Green who canā€™t deliver anything?

                  I think there might be enough progressives who really do care about trans rights and/or climate to make up for losing the ones who only care about UBI. And I think Democrats donā€™t need every last progressive voter to win.

                  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    Ā·
                    edit-2
                    7 days ago

                    in the past.

                    Yep.

                    that might be enough to vote for the Democrat

                    You should ask yourself why youā€™re trying to get away with not delivering things that progressives want, or why youā€™re trying to deliver just enough things to coax their votes, but nothing more. Like, do you hear yourself?

                    instead of the Republican who offers nothing?

                    You think this is actually occurring in real life? Theyā€™re just not voting. And Republicans vote in enough numbers to beat the Democrat base every single time.

                    ā€œWe can win without a progressive candidate, but the only Democrat candidate who has won in recent history is Biden, who was actually pretty progressiveā€ Hmmmmmmmmmmm. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmā€¦

                    I mean if Biden is pretty progressive then Iā€™d argue Obamaā€™s 2008 campaign was too on the same scale, soā€¦ seems like the only time Democrats have won since basically the cold war was with progressive candidatesā€¦ šŸ¤·