I don’t know how many people here support radqueers, and if you don’t you can just block or defederate us, but my Lemmy instance here at rqd2.net opened up last night! If you wanna discuss transids, paras, or anything else stigmatized, this is the place to do it! You can sign up if you want, but we currently federate with burggit.moe, so you can participate in our communities from your instance! See you there? :)
For the record, this radqueer community allows (pro-c) MAPs to be in the same space as minors. It also has a community self-described as “for pro-c girllove discussion”.
I appreciate the heads up. I checked out the communities and even posted in a couple but I am going to have to make sure to avoid anything that is pro-c.
So i gotta ask what pro-c means
pro-contact.
That’s, uh, kinda problematic wtf
I’m not sure to what extent pro-c people actually do any c-ing versus just believing that it should be legal. Does anyone know?
I don’t agree with pro-c’ers, but I’m not sure to what extent the latter is problematic. I guess being “problematic” is subjective, so anything you strongly disagree with is then “problematic.” From a more objective perspective, though, the latter does not cause any harm*, so I wouldn’t call it that.
*There is a caveat here: perhaps being vocally pro-c would encourage others to actually c. I don’t know.
Unliked your own comment, what a move
Their personal website is on “freak.university” is a haven for zoo and pedophiles. Also it’s full of hardcore “transage, transrace, transautictic” LARPers.
There is every indication that individuals with these identities are being completely genuine about it, so it’s pretty inappropriate (and I’d say offensive) to attempt to trivialize people’s identities as a joke or intentional fantasy.