I don’t know how many people here support radqueers, and if you don’t you can just block or defederate us, but my Lemmy instance here at rqd2.net opened up last night! If you wanna discuss transids, paras, or anything else stigmatized, this is the place to do it! You can sign up if you want, but we currently federate with burggit.moe, so you can participate in our communities from your instance! See you there? :)

  • SomeRandomAccount@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the record, this radqueer community allows (pro-c) MAPs to be in the same space as minors. It also has a community self-described as “for pro-c girllove discussion”.

    • Phossu@burggit.moe
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I appreciate the heads up. I checked out the communities and even posted in a couple but I am going to have to make sure to avoid anything that is pro-c.

          • Mousepad@burggit.moe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure to what extent pro-c people actually do any c-ing versus just believing that it should be legal. Does anyone know?

            I don’t agree with pro-c’ers, but I’m not sure to what extent the latter is problematic. I guess being “problematic” is subjective, so anything you strongly disagree with is then “problematic.” From a more objective perspective, though, the latter does not cause any harm*, so I wouldn’t call it that.

            *There is a caveat here: perhaps being vocally pro-c would encourage others to actually c. I don’t know. ablobthinking

    • lodedDiaper@burggit.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their personal website is on “freak.university” is a haven for zoo and pedophiles. Also it’s full of hardcore “transage, transrace, transautictic” LARPers.

      • Pink Bow@burggit.moe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is every indication that individuals with these identities are being completely genuine about it, so it’s pretty inappropriate (and I’d say offensive) to attempt to trivialize people’s identities as a joke or intentional fantasy.

  • Mousepad@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We had a !discussions@burggit.moe post a while ago about allowing a MAP community on burggit. I think ultimately it was decided that it would have to be too restrictive to be of interest to any of its potential users. Hopefully the interested parties see this post. Good luck!