cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25921559

Link above goes to the Daily Kos post that discovered the scrubbing. Hereā€™s the text of the original article:

Former Intelligence Officer Claims KGB Recruited Trump

Isabel Van Brugen ā€“ The Daily Beast ā€“ 21 February 2025

A former Soviet intelligence officer has alleged that Donald Trump was recruited by the KGB in 1987 and given the codename ā€œKrasnov.ā€

Alnur Mussayev, 71, a former Kazakh intelligence chief, made the explosive claim in a Facebook post on Thursday. He claimed that he served in the 6th Directorate of the KGB in Moscow, which was responsible for counter-intelligence support within the economy. One of its key objectives, he claimed, was ā€œrecruiting businessmen from capitalist countries.ā€

Mussayev wrote that in 1987 ā€œour directorate recruited Donald Trump, a 40-year-old American businessman, under the pseudonym Krasnov.ā€

He reiterated that the department specialized in recruiting spies and intelligence sources from the West, asserting once again that Trump had been brought into the fold.

ā€œI hope Iā€™ll survive a third assassination attempt,ā€ he said in a comment below his post.

He made another shocking allegation in another comment, saying: ā€œToday, the personal file of resident ā€˜Krasnovā€™ has been removed from the FSB. It is being privately managed by one of Putinā€™s close associates.ā€

Mussayevā€™s allegations, while unfounded, add to ongoing speculation about Trumpā€™s connections to Russia. Trumpā€™s first visit to Moscow as a real estate developer in 1987 drew intense scrutiny and speculation that the trip was arranged by the KGB for dubious reasons.

According to Politico, in 1985, the KGB updated a secret personality questionnaire distributed among the agency, advising case officers what to look for in a successful recruitment operation.

The document instructed agents to target ā€œprominent figures in the Westā€ with the goal of drawing them ā€œinto some form of collaboration with usā€¦ as an agent, or confidential or special or unofficial contact.ā€

Trump has denied any improper ties to Moscow or collusion with President Vladimir Putin.

The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House and Russiaā€™s Foreign Ministry for comment.

U.S. officials have also expressed concerns about Trumpā€™s relationship with Putin.

Anthony Scaramucci who briefly served as Trumpā€™s White House communications director in 2017, said during an episode of ā€œThe Rest Is Politics: USā€ podcast with co-host Katty Kay on Friday that he thinks there is a mysterious ā€œholdā€ on the president.

Scaramucci did not elaborate on what he believes that ā€œholdā€ might be, adding only: ā€œI donā€™t know why itā€™s like this. [H.R.] McMaster couldnā€™t figure it out, [James] Mattis couldnā€™t figure it out, [John] Kelly couldnā€™t figure it out.ā€

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    Ā·
    1 day ago

    Are VPNs still good at getting around government restrictions of blocking sites? Only a matter of time nowā€¦

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      There are only a few VPNs that actually donā€™t keep logs and thus canā€™t be subpoenaed by governments for info.

      All the popular ones you commonly see advertised or written about in ā€˜best ofā€™ type reviewsā€¦ theyā€™ll protect you from a man in the middle attack (which almost no one does or falls victim to), and allow you to bypass region restrictionsā€¦ but all a government has to do is say nope, thats illegal now, as is already the case in many more restrictive countries.

      Oh, youā€™re paying for your VPN with your debit card? Credit card? Oh cool, now we know which VPN company to get your data from.

      This is one of the few legit use cases for crypto, monero anyway (all the others can be de-anonymized fairly easily by someone who knows how), paying covertly for a VPN.

      Mullvad is probably the best actually safe VPN to use.

      I might also suggeat you look into I2P, which functionally turns all your internet traffic into an anonymized, decentralized shared torrent protocol.

      Its quite slow compared to high powered VPNs, but basically, because everyone in the system is their only little miniature routing hub for everyone else, and everyones data is mixed together in shared, but partitioned and encrypted packets, its quite hard to definitively nail down exactly what any particular user is doing.

      https://i2pd.website/

      It is a bit more conplicated to set up, in general, than most modern VPNs which usually just have an app that ā€˜just worksā€™.

    • polakkenak@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      1 day ago

      The technology of VPN works great for circumventing censorship. VPN can be blocked, but itā€™s a game of whack a mole between the state and private actors. The main vulnerability in hosted VPN is that the provider has the ability to sell you out if law enforcement comes knocking. Picking a trusted provider is key. Alternatively, thereā€™s TOR but that isnā€™t perfect either, as anyone may participate in the network.

      • twelvegoats@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        Ā·
        22 hours ago

        I use Mullvad which isnā€™t based in the US. They claim no logs and that nothing is retained. Itā€™s about $5.75 a month, pretty good for what you get

        • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          NordVPN is based in Panama (and its parent company is a Lithuanian), also claims no logs, and often has very cheap deals. People get irritated with their adverts but the service itself seems good. Of course, you canā€™t know for sure who is trustworthy but Nord looks OK.

          Though if Trump invades Panama it might be time to look for another VPN provider.