There’s no removed comments. I looked through my profile cause like sometimes I just be saying shit so I was okay maybe. But I can’t find any comments on that community. Just the old 196.

Idk if this is where to post this but I just wanted to rant. It’s my first time ever being banned so it felt ouch.

      • LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        So what about all the people who were banned from blahaj back in december for dissent?

        What 196 are they supposed to use?

        Literally the biggest poster on 196 was banned and was forced to move over to .world despite them saying they are ok with Neopronouns. And everyone just called them a TERF instead of listening to them.

        From my perspective that is not really an inclusive community concerned with protecting LGBTQ people, it’s blatant suppression of dissent.

        Most people who were banned for “Gatekeeping” then and since then were really just banned because the admins didn’t like them despite them dispite not breaking rules.

        You keep posting numbers, but you then ignore the dedicated base for the world community that is not going away.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          So what about all the people who were banned from blahaj back in december for dissent?

          No one was banned for dissent. People were banned for gatekeeping, misgendering and repeatedly and/or deliberately misgendering folk.

          Most people who were banned for “Gatekeeping” then and since then were really just banned because the admins didn’t like them despite them dispite not breaking rules.

          The rule is don’t misgender and gatekeep other folks and block or ignore them if you can’t deal with their identity or pronouns. The modlog is right there. If you can find a single instance of someone getting banned without breaking that or another rule, I want to know about it

          • LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            So nobody was banned for dissent, but you will unban people who were banned for Gatekeeping because they weren’t actually Gatekeeping?

            So if they weren’t banned for dissent or Gatekeeping, what was the reason?

            I let them know, but this is really inconsistent policy

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 days ago

              The only people who were banned were gatekeeping other folks identities. If you find an example of someone that was banned who didn’t do that, I will unban them.

              If you find that inconsistent or confusing, I’m not sure what to tell you…

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          the biggest poster on 196 was banned for saying “i respect neopronouns BUT your policy of not allowing harassment for neopronouns isn’t for me and so i am preemptively leaving” while screaming stuff about how dragons aren’t real instead of just blocking and reporting offensive users as the mods explicitly asked.

          to clarify. it’s a bit worse than you express. :)

        • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          You seem to know a lot about the whole story for a 20 days old account.

          Literally the biggest poster on 196 was banned and was forced to move over to .world

          1. Who was that?
          2. If that happened indeed as you describe it, how is this supposed to justify moving the whole community without the members asking first?

          dedicated base for the world community

          The two people who posted there in the last 24 hours?

          https://lemmy.world/c/196?dataType=Post&sort=New

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            So what about all the people who were banned from blahaj back in december for dissent?

            What 196 are they supposed to use?

            • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              They should open a thread here documenting Why their ban was a power trip.

              Two possible outcomes

              1. Ada was power tripping and unbans them
              2. Their bans were deserved

              If there was already such a post, feel free to link to it, sorry if I don’t remember, it’s been a while to be honest

          • LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I have to uae burners because I don’t want my main account banned from blahaj from them lurking here

            I’ve talked with them and why they post there every day deapite the other communities existing, and that’s what they said.

            From what I can tell that whole community is there because of the christmas ban wave, most of them are trans people who said they never gatekept and respect Neopronouns.

            They also said you specifically lurk these threads and resort to personal attacks against people who crtique blahaj, like pointing at account age instead of engaging in good faith with the people who got banned from blahaj admin abuse.

            • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              You still haven’t told me who was that main poster who was banned.

              Not sure who is the one not engaging in good faith in this conversation.

              • LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                After asking if I could share they said they don’t want their main account getting banned from blahaj in retaliation.

                I’m sorry

                • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  If someone back then was banned for gatekeeping or misgendering and won’t do that anymore, not only will they not be banned in “retaliation”, their banned account will be unbanned. All they need to do is reach out to me

                  If someone back then was banned for gatekeeping and misgendering, but didn’t do those things, not only will they not be banned in “retaliation”, their banned account will be unbanned. All they need to do is reach out to me.

                  If someone back then was banned for gatekeeping and misgendering and they don’t reach out to me, I still I won’t ban their new account if I become aware of it, because the point of all of this is to make it clear that gatekeeping and misgendering are not on. If they’re not doing that on their second account, their second account won’t get banned, because the first ban achieved its purpose.

                  tl;dr - Whoever they are, if they’re not gatekeeping and misgendering folk, they’ll be fine.

                • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  But you said they were already banned back in December. I’m just asking for the banned account, it should publicly displayed in the modlog.

                  I’m not asking for their new alt.

      • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh yes, that’s why I’m the one keeping alive

        Also, if the LW community team could avoid mower tripping to try to xintimidate" me when I post elsewhere than LW or whatever that was: https://lemmy.world/post/24489154

        They also admitted that they consider Federation to be a “divorce feature” and that the best experience is centralized

        Federation is a feature like divorce is a feature. It’s extremely important that it exists and is accessible. Not everybody needs to do it. Other servers are a fine option if you know what you’re doing and are willing to deal with more issues OR if there’s a compelling reason (such as the various regional servers).

        https://lemmy.world/comment/14933488

        I respect the sysadmins work, but some people in the LW community should really reassess their stance towards centralization and other instances.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oh yes, that’s why I’m the one keeping alive

          hahaha gottem XD

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Also, if the LW community team could avoid mower tripping to try to xintimidate" me when I post elsewhere than LW or whatever that was: https://lemmy.world/post/24489154

          When you have a long history of starting shit with .world, your actions will increasingly be interpreted in a negative light - including when you don’t mean them to be negative.

          They also admitted that they consider Federation to be a “divorce feature” and that the best experience is centralized

          Federation is a feature like divorce is a feature. It’s extremely important that it exists and is accessible. Not everybody needs to do it. Other servers are a fine option if you know what you’re doing and are willing to deal with more issues OR if there’s a compelling reason (such as the various regional servers).

          Okay?

          I respect the sysadmins work, but some people in the LW community should really reassess their stance towards centralization and other instances.

          Considering you are constantly picking fights with the comm team over the pettiest shit (and I don’t mean to give them a pass, considering they engage on said petty shit with equal vigor), gonna press X to doubt.

          • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            When you have a long history of starting shit with .world, your actions will increasingly be interpreted in a negative light - including when you don’t mean them to be negative.

            Is documenting power trips starting shit now?