DeadNinja@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 11 hours agoOpenAI Says It’s "Over" If It Can’t Steal All Your Copyrighted Workfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down19cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comprivacy@lemmy.world
arrow-up1371arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI Says It’s "Over" If It Can’t Steal All Your Copyrighted Workfuturism.comDeadNinja@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 11 hours agomessage-square75fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comprivacy@lemmy.world
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·11 hours agoRight. The problem is not the fact it consumes the information, the problem is if the user uses it to violate copyright. It’s just a tool after all. Like, I’m capable of violating copyright in infinitely many ways, but I usually don’t.
minus-squareSoulWager@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-29 hours agoThe problem is that the user usually can’t tell if the AI output is infringing someone’s copyright or not unless they’ve seen all the training data.
Right. The problem is not the fact it consumes the information, the problem is if the user uses it to violate copyright. It’s just a tool after all.
Like, I’m capable of violating copyright in infinitely many ways, but I usually don’t.
The problem is that the user usually can’t tell if the AI output is infringing someone’s copyright or not unless they’ve seen all the training data.