Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting thisā€¦)

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    Ā·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    It would appear CNN was also at the eugenics conference? Why are all these mainstream news orgs at a 200-person event where all the speakers are eugenicists and racists?

    https://bsky.app/profile/bmceuen.bsky.social/post/3lmmtefdl422j

    And in response to an Atlantic subhead saying ā€œPerpetuating humanity should be a cross-politics consensus, but the left was mostly absent at a recent pro-natalism conferenceā€:

    yeah, weird that the left wasnā€™t present at the Fourteen Words conference

    https://bsky.app/profile/jamellebouie.net/post/3lmmqjx3fdc2e

  • Architeuthis@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Hereā€™s a screenshot of a skeet of a screenshot of a tweet featuring an unusually shit take on WW2 by Moldbug:

    link

    transcript

    skeet by Joe Stieb: Another tweet that should have ended with the first sentence.

    Also, I guess Iā€™m a ā€œWorld War Two enjoyerā€

    tweet by Curtis Yarvin: There is very very extensive evidence of the Holocaust.

    Unfortunately for WW2 enjoyers, the US and England did not go to war to stop the Holocaust. They went to war to stop the Axis plan for world conquest.

    There is no evidence of the Axis plan for world conquest.

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      8 hours ago

      ironically many ā€œWW2 enjoyersā€ are big fans of German hardware, uniforms and tacticsā€¦

      • Architeuthis@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The vibe I get is that by ā€˜enjoyersā€™ he means people who thought fighting the nazis in WW2 was morally justified.

    • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Oh gosh I looked up the post and that was a mistake. Actually Mr. Yarvin there is quote tweeting someone who dared, on twitter, to say that the Holocaust was real. The replies (including Yarvinā€™s incorrect & off topic nonsense) being about what youā€™d expect from twitter nowadays. So much Holocaust denial.

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      12 hours ago

      Unusually shit take on WW2 but not an unusually shit take from Moldbug. Just the usual level of shit.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      14 hours ago

      I think itā€™s accurate that the US and England didnā€™t join to stop the Holocaust. Sentence 3 is a little oversimplified, and sentence 4 is straight-up lunacy.

      • Architeuthis@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Old and busted: whitewashing hitlerism by pretending the holocaust didnā€™t happen.

        New hotness: pretending the holocaust just sort of happened one day, completely unrelated to the explicit ideology of the people who planned and executed it and the regime that sanctioned it, and anyway they had their hands full defending themselves against unprovoked attacks by the so-called allies, who can blame them.

      • swlabr@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        8 hours ago

        I checked the link, the thread elaborates a bit more:

        to which my understanding is: this is absolutely true as well.

        • gerikson@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          Ā·
          5 hours ago

          I found it too, it makes the point that Nazi Germany did nothing wrong in attcking other countries, stealing their products, and enslaving their people" is an argument Putin could have made.

          • bitofhope@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            Ā·
            4 hours ago

            Oh, but you see the axis powers only ever wanted to conquer most of Europe, North Africa, a bunch of islands in the Pacific, most of Southeast Asia, Korea and large parts of mainland China, which the allies would have been completely fine with. Nothing suggests they would actually go for full conquest victory. What is a ā€œLebensraumā€? Is it a type of cheese?

            • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              Ā·
              3 hours ago

              Now hang on how many of those conquests were for actual land grab reasons and how many were because they expected people to take issue with starting massive offensive wars for land grab reasons, especially what with the declared intent to ethnically cleanse at least all of Eastern Europe. Thatā€™s definitely distinct from planning world conquest, right?

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    Because it is nice to have something entertaining for a change:

    https://bsky.app/profile/willsmith.fun/post/3lmi2bjrao22t

    Wow, that latest chat with Adam Patrick Murray about the Nintendo Switch 2 was quite the ride! The bit on the consoleā€™s dock secrets and the MicroSD Express storage had me glued. Itā€™s amazing to see how these tech advancements are sculpting new landscapes.

    Speaking of tech wizardry, have you thought about having Christian Perry on the show? As the CEO of Undetectable AI, heā€™s taken the whole generative AI world by storm, much like the Switch 2 is taking over gaming news! With over 15 million users and standing as a top AI writing tool, Christianā€™s insights into AIā€™s hidden workings promise to intrigue your audience, especially when it comes to how his tools seamlessly pass for human writing without tripping any detectors like GPTzero

    Undetectable AI, everyone. Astounding.

  • scruiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    I feel like some of the doomers are already setting things up to pivot when their most major recent prophecy (AI 2027) fails:

    From here:

    (My modal timeline has loss of control of Earth mostly happening in 2028, rather than late 2027, but nitpicking at that scale hardly matters.)

    It starts with some rationalist jargon to say the author agrees but one year laterā€¦

    AI 2027 knows this. Their scenario is unrealistically smooth. If they added a couple weird, impactful events, it would be more realistic in its weirdness, but of course it would be simultaneously less realistic in that those particular events are unlikely to occur. This is why the modal narrative, which is more likely than any other particular story, centers around loss of human control the end of 2027, but the median narrative is probably around 2030 or 2031.

    Further walking the timeline back, adding qualifiers and exceptions that the authors of AI 2027 somehow didnā€™t explain before. Also, the reason AI 2027 didnā€™t have any mention of Trump blowing up the timeline doing insane shit is because Scott (and maybe some of the other authors, idk) like glazing Trump.

    I expect the bottlenecks to pinch harder, and for 4x algorithmic progress to be an overestimateā€¦

    No shit, that is what every software engineering blogging about LLMs (even the credulous ones) say, even allowing LLMs get better at raw code writing! Maybe this author is better in touch with reality than most lesswrongersā€¦

    ā€¦but not by much.

    Nope, they still have insane expectations.

    Most of my disagreements are quibbles

    Then why did you bother writing this? Anyway, I feel like this author has set themselves up to claim credit when itā€™s December 2027 and none of AI 2027ā€™s predictions are true. Theyā€™ll exaggerate their ā€œquibblesā€ into successful predictions of problems in the AI 2027 timeline, while overlooking the extent to which they agreed.

    Iā€™ll give this author +10 bayes points for noticing Trump does unpredictable batshit stuff, and -100 for not realizing the real reason why Scott didnā€™t include any call out of that in AI 2027.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Iā€™ll give this author +10 bayes points for noticing Trump does unpredictable batshit stuff

      +10 bayes points

      Has someone on LW already proposed a BayesCoin or have I just figured out how to steal lunch money from all rationalists at once

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          Ā·
          1 day ago

          HP fanfic but house points are crypto and the chocolate frog cards are NFTs tracked on a magical blockchain

          • o7___o7@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            Ā·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Non Fungible Toads

            Edit: this is a nonsequitur, but my wife just shared this with me and it is delightful

      • scruiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        With a name like that and lesswrong to springboard itā€™s popularity, BayesCoin should be good for at least one cycle of pump and dump/rug-pull.

        Do some actual programming work (or at least write a ā€œwhite paperā€) on tying it into a prediction market on the blockchain and youā€™ve got rationalist catnip, they should be all over it, you could do a few cycles of pumping and dumping before the final rug pull.

  • sus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    Ā·
    3 days ago

    Some dark urge found me skim-reading a recent AI doomer blog post. I was startled awake by this most unsettling passage:

    My wife wrote a letter to our infant daughter recently. It concluded:

    I donā€™t know that we can offer you a good world, or even one that will be around for all that much longer. But I hope we can offer you a good childhood. [ā€¦]

    Though the theoretical possibility had always been percolating somewhere in the back of my mind, it wasnā€™t until now that I viscerally realized that P(doomers reproducing) was greater than zero. And with other doomers no less.

    Left brooding on this development, I drudged along until-
    BAhahaha what the fuck
    I canā€™t. This is beyond parody.

    Completely lost it here. Nothing could have prepared me for the poorly handwritten wrist tattoo.

    Creating space for miracles
    Doom feels really likely to me. [ā€¦] But who knows, perhaps one of my assumptions is wrong. Perhaps thereā€™s some luck better than humanity deserves. If this happens to be the case, I want to be in a position to make use of it.

    Oh how rational! Willing to entertain the idea that maybe, theoretically, the doomsday prediction could be off by a few days?

    Iā€™m not sure that I ever strongly felt that I would die at eighty or so. I had a religious youth and believed in an immortal soul. Even when I came out of that, I quickly believed in the potential of radical transhuman life extension.

    This guy thought he was getting clean but he was actually replacing weed with heroin
    I really convinced myself that ā€œdoomsday cultā€ was hyperbole but uhh, nope, itā€™s 107% real.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      I had a religious youth and believed in an immortal soul. Even when I came out of that, I quickly believed in the potential of radical transhuman life extension.

      My dude youā€™re so, so, sooo close to realising it, you should spontaneously quantum-tunnel into self-awareness any second now

    • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Also, man why do I click on these links and read the LWers comments. Itā€™s always insufferable people being like, ā€œwoe is us, to be cursed with the forbidden knowledge of AI doom, we are all such deep thinkers, the lay person simply could not understand the danger of aiā€ like bruv it aint that deep, i think i can summarize it as follows:

      hits blunt ā€œbruv, imagine if you were a porkrind, you wouldnā€™t be able to tell why a person is eating a hotdog, ai will be like we are to a porkchop, and to get more hotdogs humans will find a way to turn the sun into a meat casing, this is the principle of intestinal convergenceā€

      Literally saw another comment where one of them accused the other of being a ā€œsuper intelligence denierā€ (i.e., heretic) for suggesting maybe we should wait till the robot swarms coming over the hills before we declare its game over.

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      At the start they state

      The disappointment of imminent death is all the more crushing because just a few years ago researchers announced breakthrough discoveries that suggested [existing, adult] humans could have healthspans of thousands of years. To drop the analogy, here Iā€™m talking about my transhumanist beliefs. The laws of physics donā€™t demand that humans slowly decay and die at eighty. It is within our engineering prowess to defeat death, and until recently I thought we might just do that, and I and my loved ones would live for millennia, becoming post-human superbeings.

      This is, frankly, bonkers. Iā€™d rate the following in descending order of probability

      1. worldwide societal collapse due to climate change
      2. we develop an AI that will kill us all for unspecified reasons
      3. we establish viable self-sustaining societies outside the limits of Earth
      4. we develop techniques that allow everyone to live effectively forever

      If the first happens, it removes the material requirements for the latter things to happen. This is an extreme form of ā€œdenial of the fleshā€, the inability to realize that without food or water no-one will be working on AI or life extension tech.

      • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        ā€œIm 99% sure I will die in the next year because of super duper intelligence, but in a world where that doesnt happen i plan to live 1000 yearsā€ surely is a forecast. Surprised they donā€™t break their own necks on the whiplash from this take.

    • scruiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      Doom feels really likely to me. [ā€¦] But who knows, perhaps one of my assumptions is wrong. Perhaps thereā€™s some luck better than humanity deserves. If this happens to be the case, I want to be in a position to make use of it.

      This line actually really annoys me, because they are already set up for moving the end date on their doomsday prediction as needed while still maintaining their overall doomerism.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      I donā€™t know that we can offer you a good world, or even one that will be around for all that much longer. But I hope we can offer you a good childhood. [ā€¦]

      When ā€œThe world is gonna end soon so letā€™s just rawdog from now onā€ gets real

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      Apparently including a camera-esque filename in prompts for the latest mid journey release can make it more photorealistic.

      This entire enterprise is just shamanry, we are like two steps away from ā€œthrowing a goat into a volcano makes your next prompt more realisticā€

  • maol@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    Ā·
    3 days ago

    Some more low effort image posting. This zine was in Connolly Books for free. Iā€™m not sure who the author is, but I thought the text was spot on and the illustrations were great. Sorry for no captions/transcriptions

        • Soyweiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          Ā·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Otoh having different groups of the sneer, sneercells (no wait that name needs work) if you will. Can also be useful, esp as authoritarianism etc increases. (Not that I think govs would go after us, apart from an infiltration risk).

          E: Hell, I myself am prob a risk factor. First the Dutch secret service should have file on me (else they are not doing their job, I was active in student activism, and did STEM (which also had an active (and targeted for infiltration, we know because counterhacks) hacker group) education (a known terrorism risk increaser), before my faulty brain wiring caused me to drop off the map a bit, and I know several of these groups have been targeted for infiltration recently, and long ago). I also have had just too many official twitter police accounts follow me and then unfollow me without liking a single post for it to be just a coincidence (three times being enemy action). Of course, Iā€™m now old and passive, so if they still think Iā€™m a risk they certainly are not doing their job (I could be a source of information however). But this is enough for me to consider that my real life identity is known enough to be a risk. And this is just about the Dutch police/secret service, there is also the risk of TracingWoodGrains like people trying to get all up in your (social) networks to try and get validation from themotte. And I have read enough stories about cybercriminals that you need to think about this stuff long before it is actually needed, also Iā€™m paranoid.

    • mlen@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      Any idea why the flag reassembles the Swiss one (the proportions are wrong though)?

      • istewart@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        Ā·
        4 days ago

        Would you invest in commercial real estate, knowing there was a non-zero chance your tenants might come in one day to discover a thoroughly intoxicated JD Vance in a compromising position with the break-room furniture?

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      4 days ago

      So many of the responses pointing out how bad this is for the local communities in Licking County (lol), but I feel like this has to be a case where the bezzle is collapsing more than a decision causing new harm, right? The bubble wasnā€™t sustainable and those jobs were unlikely to manifest past the initial construction, especially since data centers arenā€™t exactly labor-intensive to run.

      That doesnā€™t mean it doesnā€™t hurt for those communities, especially in the midst of the economic ruin left in the wake of Hurricane Tarrif, but I feel like thereā€™s an important lesson being lost here.

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        Ā·
        4 days ago

        itā€™s also such a weird position for critique to take, imo; DCs donā€™t really do much in the way of Local Job Generation, and Iā€™d fucking bet that each of these locations also got selected because of favourable gladhanding credits (tax incentives, power incentives, etc)

        I suppose ā€œall the ${whatever business} that got bought out and flattened (for buildout space) is still goneā€ is maybe one harm, but againā€¦ these things donā€™t get built on high streets

    • BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      Thus, what appears as intellectual fast food ā€“ the ultra-processed thought-nuggets deep fried in venture capital ā€“ often conceals wholesome ingredients sourced from a gourmet pantry of quite some sophistication.

      What am I even reading.

          • Soyweiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            Ā·
            3 days ago

            Lol yeah I was thinking about either posting about cognitive dissonance or mentioning that trying to find the kernels of corn in shit still means you are digging through shit. Cognitive dysentery is so much better.

            • blakestacey@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              Ā·
              3 days ago

              As a wise friend of mine said years ago, when hipsters drinking PBR were having a cultural moment, ā€œYou can say youā€™re drinking piss beer ā€˜ironicallyā€™, but at the end of the day, youā€™re still drinking piss beer.ā€