no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWere you aware?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up1429arrow-down118
arrow-up1411arrow-down1imageWere you aware?lemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square14linkfedilink
minus-squareyesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down3·1 year agoI called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
minus-squarescholar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45·1 year agoNapoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·1 year agoAnecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·1 year ago… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.zipdeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-28 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoSounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
I called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
Napoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
deleted by creator
At least one person gets the joke
Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
thatsthejoke.zip