"Fuck you, we're not paying": inside Unity’s Runtime Fee fiasco - Mobilegamer.biz
mobilegamer.biz
A major partner told John Riccitiello personally that it will not pay the Runtime Fee – and in the strongest possible terms.

A major partner told John Riccitiello personally that it will not pay the Runtime Fee – and in the strongest possible terms.

  • Johanno@feddit.deEnglish
    32·
    1 year ago

    Gdot is FOSS engine. This means it will most probably never pull shit like that and even if everybody is allowed to fork it before a bad change and continue with that

    • deleted@lemmy.worldEnglish
      913·
      1 year ago

      While I totally agree with what you said, big corps would work hard to limit FOSS.

      Googles web integrity API is an example of what might happen.

      Nvidia could pull shit like this processing only “trusted” code from trusted source like steam which might not consider FOSS as trusted.

      Don’t get me wrong. I use Linux and I prefer FOSS over closed source software.

      But recently the gate seems to be getting closed slowly. Corps devoting their resources to lobby against FOSS.

      • El Barto@lemmy.worldEnglish
        27·
        1 year ago

        Corps devoting their resources to lobby against FOSS.

        That has been a decades long battle. They’ll never win the war.

        Microsoft was 100% against Linux 15 years ago. Now there is a Linux subsystem sitting next to the core of the OS.

        • DosDude👾AEnglish
          15·
          1 year ago

          And honestly it seems like FOSS solutions are way more usable these days. In the old days it was a huge hit in either features or UI.

        • qaz@lemmy.worldEnglish
          7·
          1 year ago

          Yes, they’ve taken an “if you can’t beat them, join them” approach to FOSS for a while now.

      • Johanno@feddit.deEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        However you still can brew your own soup if there is a foss Version of a program out there.