• keepthepace@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Reading the Nausicaä mangas convinced me otherwise. He is one of those believers in the wisdom of nature and the inherent evilness of tech. Which is a shame because I really like his universes otherwise.

    • blue_berry@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ok, that’s a little let-down. Although I don’t think its that he is completely against tech, maybe his views changed over time since many of his movies feature technical advantages and not always in a bad way, for example the moving castle …

      • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The Moving Castle is not his own story, it comes from a novel.

        The underlying theme of his movies is that tech is attractive and that good people use tech to do good but that it always ends badly anyway. That they would have been better off without going that road.

        • blue_berry@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ok, you’re starting to convince me. I still think some of his works are great solar punk even though maybe he didn’t intented them to be …

          • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Oh certainly! But just like William Gibson hated the term “cyberpunk” despite being considered a main pillar of the genre, I think Miyazaki would reject the “solarpunk” term even though Laputa is pretty much spot on in that style!