Kyle Rittenhouse’s sister Faith is seeking $3,000 on a crowdfunding website in a bid to prevent the eviction of herself and her mother Wendy from their home, citing her “brother’s unwillingness to provide or contribute to our family.”

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wrong. It’s an open carry state, there was nothing strange about it.

    If it was such a “provocation”, then why did nobody give a shit when he showed up, even though it was super obvious he was armed with a long rifle? How come he walked around for hours doing his thing (handing out water bottles, giving basic medical care to whoever asked (at least 8 people according to evidence and trial testimony), etc.), and literally nobody gave a shit, while he had that rifle on him the whole time?

    Rosenbaum literally screamed “I’m going to kill you” at Rittenhouse, and for what? Because he put out Rosenbaum’s dumpster fire.

    Get real.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        6 months ago

        Correcting false statements with known facts (it’s so extra absurd because there is SO MUCH hard evidence!) is not fascism. It’s not even political at all.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            6 months ago

            It says a lot about you that caring about the truth makes someone a loser in your eyes.

            I’ll defend anyone against what I know to be lies about them. Their politics are completely irrelevant.

            It’s called having principles, and valuing them, instead of the narrative of an ideology that prioritizes its propagation over what’s actually true.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sorry… are you under the bizarre impression that because it’s legal to carry a gun, you can’t provoke someone with it?

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, I’m contradicting the ridiculous argument that existing in public while armed, in an open carry state, is somehow, in and of itself, provocation.

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            :/

            I agree that Kyle is a bad person, Flying, but there is a lot of misinformation being spread around that makes our side look bad. I know it’s an emotionally charged topic.

            If Hitler rescues a dog he’s still a bad person. But it doesn’t help to mythologize characters through false narratives because it empowers them even further. Just my opinion. I’m not on team Kyle and I’m not a fascist (sad I have to state this last tag on Lemmy in case I get misconstrued).

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Everyone is talking past each other in this thread. I understand, it’s an emotionally charged topic.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Well, the guy I replied to who said:

                  I’m contradicting the ridiculous argument that existing in public while armed, in an open carry state, is somehow, in and of itself, provocation.

                  is certainly talking past everyone else since literally no one made that argument.

                  And then for some reason you criticized me for telling them that no one made that argument, despite that being a fact.

                  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Yeah I think you’re saying that --correct me if I’m wrong-- him

                    bringing the AR to the protests is an act of provocation

                    while the person you’re arguing with said

                    open carry is not uncommon and no one felt provoked

                    At least that’s how I read it. Maybe I’m wrong. I can see how both statements could be true to some extent. Many protesters were from out of state and possibly not familiar with the open carry laws in WI so it’s possible they felt threatened immediately. I’m no longer living in the US, and I never lived in an open carry state, so the sight of an AR strapped to a kid would make me uncomfortable in that situation. However, I’ve also lived in the middle east were the sight of soldiers walking around not in uniform carrying semi automatic rifles was very common and that did not make me uncomfortable. So context is important.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        Actions speak louder than words, especially when those words are a teen talking big to his friends.

        The fact is, nothing he did in Kenosha supports the claim that he wanted to kill anyone, period, and everything he did directly contradicts it. He showed zero aggression toward anyone, and his first response to aggression toward him was to RUN AWAY, every single time. Bottom line, none of the people who got shot would have gotten shot if they had let him run away.

        • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          ROFL…. “locker room talk” right? You apologists are fucking hilarious. Where I come from (America) this is called “Premeditated Murder.” And in any courtroom with an unbiased judge, he’d have been convicted on that alone.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            6 months ago

            ‘You can tell he planned to kill someone by the fact that he never showed aggression toward anyone, and his first response to unprovoked aggression toward him, all three times, was to run away’

            lol

            • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              You can tell he planned to kill someone by the fact that he said this:

              “Bro, I wish I had my f—ing AR. I’d start shooting rounds at them."

              lol indeed.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I like how they’re saying he never showed aggression to anyone despite showing up with a fucking rifle.

              • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                6 months ago

                Actions speak louder than words. He was around tons of looters (that’s what the people he was talking about were doing, when he said that) that day. Why didn’t he ‘shoot rounds’ at any of them, if that was his plan? He had all the opportunity in the world.

                That’s the question people making this argument can’t answer honestly, because the only honest answer is that what he did directly contradicts what he said.

                Arguing that he planned to do something that he literally didn’t do, despite myriad opportunities, is just silly.

                Actions speak louder.

                • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Again… you apologists are fucking hilarious. Dude wanted to kill people. He killed people. No amount of hand waiving and excuses from you will change that.

                  It’s a fact. And it is easily proven via reality.

                  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Yes, ok. But you’re not providing a counterargument. These are all just feelings. It’s possible he was there to kill people. It’s also possible he saw what happened in Minneapolis when rioters set entire storefronts on fire a few weeks prior and was concerned about his community.

                    If he really wanted just to kill people he had lots more opportunities before he was being chased. The person you’re responding too is just countering your arguments but all you have very charged feelings about the case which is understandable.

                    Kyle is a bad person who did something really stupid but it doesn’t help to fight every person on details which have been disproven in court. The whole trial is available to watch online. Our side needs to do better and stay grounded in facts otherwise we just lose all credibility.