• Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Had an interview for an amazon fulfilment center desk job. It went great, I was a perfect fit, except they wanted me to work in the office 4 out of 5 days a week. (It wasn’t clear in the job listing)

    When I asked which part of the job requires a physical presence it turned out none of it. Zero. Nada. They told me an employee must be an exceptional asset to get authorization for full remote work.

    I got an offer, but refused as it was too much commuting. The recruiter contacted me afterwards if I would give it another thought, but refused again.

      • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        My last job was super flexible. I could work 1-5 days from home if I wanted to. It was great as the office was 90 min drive from my place.

        So we get a new leader, who is super enthusiastic and introduces himself as best buddy/superboss. Fast forward 6 months and 4 office days are mandatory and 1 home office is allowed if you schedule it a week in advance.

        Reason? He thinks we perform better, but the real reason was he wanted to keep an eye on us. Fast forward two more months and I was the third person handing in the resignation.

        Boss man is still convinced it’s the lack of support from the head office which drives the people away.and it has nothing to do with mandatory office days.

        • LilDestructiveSheep@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Self reflection is often poor. I am not allowed working from home. Even when proving that I am more effective if everyone leaves me alone and just work. Too many distractions in the office.

    • balls_expert@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I got a new job that has no remote possibilities because we run a defense SaaS thing that’s cut off from the internet, so, a real reason for it

      I’m paid 2.5x my old wage for it and everyone keeps leaving despite the insane pay. We’re about to hire a software guy that didn’t know what grep or curl was

      Granted there’s a few more hurdles (applicants must speak english fluently and make as few mistakes as possible writing in a country that’s hardly bilingual, top of the chain tech stack that might give people the feeling that they’re not qualified, …) but 2.5x the pay? I’m gonna get enough to straight up buy a house with cash in like two years

      • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I made 2.5x my current salary, which would be almost 400,000 a year, I would seriously consider returning to the office. Then I would retire in something like 10 years which is way earlier than I’m currently looking at. For that, RTO would actually be worth it.

        • balls_expert@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It wasn’t even a bad salary beforehand, it was way above average for my city and I was able to save and invest about 40% of my paycheck, now it’s almost as if all I do is saving since my living expenses are such a small part of the salary

          I thought 2.5 meant 2.5 when going in, but it’s more like an 5x on disposable income so it feels completely different

          • balls_expert@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There’s a lot of stuff in defense contracts that aren’t killing people in europe

            Procurement, borders, visas, terrorism intel, …

            I just make very boring CRUD software for international agencies to make national services interoperate better

            It’s only defense related because it necessarily has sensitive strategic information transitting through our databases