COMHASH@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml · 3 years agoNext war is on Chinalemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square118linkfedilinkarrow-up1174arrow-down16
arrow-up1168arrow-down1imageNext war is on Chinalemmygrad.mlCOMHASH@lemmygrad.ml to GenZedong@lemmygrad.ml · 3 years agomessage-square118linkfedilink
minus-squareLarkinDePark@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up24·3 years agoHow would Microsoft even know this? They make software, they’re not a counter espionage group. It’s just some poor appeal to authority or something.
minus-squareGaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·3 years agoMicrosoft definitely has a large enough employee base of security dweebs to put together a team to do stuff like this for a government contract
minus-squareLarkinDePark@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up13·3 years agoIf it’s for a government contract then they wouldn’t say “Microsoft Says”. It would just be, “We have evidence…”. This easy they get to keep their distance from the claim.
minus-squareBetter Red Than Dead@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 years agoFinancial interests maybe? Though I don’t see how
minus-squareWayeeCool [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agodeleted by creator
How would Microsoft even know this? They make software, they’re not a counter espionage group. It’s just some poor appeal to authority or something.
Microsoft definitely has a large enough employee base of security dweebs to put together a team to do stuff like this for a government contract
If it’s for a government contract then they wouldn’t say “Microsoft Says”. It would just be, “We have evidence…”. This easy they get to keep their distance from the claim.
Financial interests maybe? Though I don’t see how
deleted by creator